Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Dec;136(6):1121-1127.
doi: 10.1111/bju.70006. Epub 2025 Sep 20.

Feasibility of randomisation to radical prostatectomy or standard care in patients with metastatic prostate cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Feasibility of randomisation to radical prostatectomy or standard care in patients with metastatic prostate cancer

Lies Van den Eynde et al. BJU Int. 2025 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of randomising patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) to cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (cRP) plus systemic standard of care (SOC) vs SOC alone in Belgian centres.

Patients and methods: This is a phase II, multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label feasibility trial. Patients with newly diagnosed mPCa were screened across six centres from August 2018 to August 2024. The aim was to randomise 86 patients to either cRP with pelvic lymphadenectomy plus systemic SOC or SOC alone (including radiotherapy in low-volume disease). Eligible patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0-1 and were considered suitable candidates for local treatment. The primary endpoint was the feasibility of randomisation, assessed by the randomisation rate (randomised/eligible).

Results: A total of 325 patients with newly diagnosed mPCa were screened, of whom 170 (52%) were eligible. The main reasons for ineligibility included unresectable tumours (42% [65/155]) and inadequate surgical fitness (37% [58/155]). Among eligible patients, 75% were excluded (127/170), mostly due to patient refusal (68% [86/127]) and inclusion in competing studies (21% [27/127]). A total of 43 patients were randomised: 21 to cRP and 22 to SOC, yielding a randomisation rate of 25% (43/170). Randomisation rates were lower than anticipated, limiting feasibility in the present trial setting.

Conclusion: Randomising men with newly diagnosed mPCa to RP plus SOC vs SOC alone proved challenging in this Belgian trial. Major barriers to recruitment included limited surgical eligibility and patient refusal. Targeted recruitment strategies or alternative trial designs should be considered.

Keywords: androgen‐deprivation therapy; cytoreduction; hormone naïve; metastasis; newly diagnosed; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; radiotherapy; randomisation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. SEER*explorer: an interactive website for SEER cancer statistics. Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute [Internet], 2024. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statistics‐network/explorer/. Accessed Mar 2025
    1. Napoli G, Arcangeli S, Fionda B et al. A systematic review and a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials' control groups in metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24: 1633–1644
    1. Cornford P, Tilki D, van den Bergh RCN et al. EAU‐EANM‐ESTRO‐ESUR‐ISUP‐SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Arnhem: EAU Guidelines Office, 2025
    1. Sweeney CJ, Chen YH, Carducci M et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 737–746
    1. Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2018; 392: 2353–2366

Publication types