Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Dec;135(6):1618-1625.
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.08.005. Epub 2025 Sep 19.

Restrictive versus liberal oxygenation in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted heart surgery: a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Restrictive versus liberal oxygenation in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted heart surgery: a randomised controlled trial

Sebastian Wiberg et al. Br J Anaesth. 2025 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Maintaining adequate oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-assisted cardiac surgery is crucial, but hyperoxia has been suggested to cause organ injury. We compared the effects of restrictive vs liberal oxygenation during CPB and weaning from CPB on clinical outcomes in cardiac surgery.

Methods: We conducted a single-centre, patient- and assessor-blinded randomised trial on adults undergoing CPB-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, or both. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to restrictive (Fio2=50%) or liberal (Fio2=100%) oxygen therapy during and for the first hour after weaning from CPB. The primary composite outcome was the time to death, stroke, renal failure requiring dialysis, or new-onset or worsening heart failure during follow-up.

Results: Among 1389 participants (mean age, 67 yr [range, 29-85 yr]; 17% female), randomisation to receive Fio2 50% resulted in median Pao2 levels of 19-23 kPa during CPB, compared with >60 kPa in participants receiving Fio2 100%. During a median follow-up period of 5.9 yr (interquartile range, 2.5-8.3), 167/695 (24%) participants in the restrictive oxygenation group and 168/694 (24%) participants in the liberal oxygenation group met the primary endpoint (hazard ratio, 1.01 [95% confidence interval, 0.8-1.3]; P=0.92). There was no difference in adverse event rates between restrictive and liberal oxygen therapy.

Conclusions: Among patients undergoing elective or urgent CPB-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, or both, no significant differences were observed in mortality, dialysis-dependent renal failure, stroke, or new-onset or worsening heart failure between a restrictive oxygenation strategy (Fio2 50%) and a liberal oxygenation strategy (Fio2 100%) during CPB and the subsequent weaning period.

Clinical trial registration: NCT02673931.

Keywords: aortic valve replacement; cardiac surgery; cardiopulmonary bypass; coronary artery bypass grafting; hyperoxia; oxygenation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of interest LK has received speaker honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Publication types

Associated data