Hearing Threshold Estimation With Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Growth Functions in People With Intellectual Disabilities in an Outreach Setting
- PMID: 40976998
- PMCID: PMC12580478
- DOI: 10.1111/jir.70043
Hearing Threshold Estimation With Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Growth Functions in People With Intellectual Disabilities in an Outreach Setting
Abstract
Background: People with intellectual disabilities often have undetected hearing loss.
Methods: In this prospective observational study featuring 110 adults with intellectual disabilities, hearing evaluations based on objective hearing threshold estimation using distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth functions (DPOAEgfs) were performed in a sheltered workshop. Results were compared with thresholds obtained by conventional subjective pure-tone audiometry (cPTA) and the adaptive self-test PTA Multiple-Choice-Auditory-Graphical-Interactive-Check (MAGIC).
Results: The differences between the lowest thresholds obtained by cPTA and MAGIC for the frequencies 1, 2, 4 and 6 kHz (LPTATs) and the estimated distortion-product thresholds (EDPTs) were calculated. Four hundred twenty-seven of 880 (48.5%) pairs of measurements did not differ by any more than 5 dB. With LPTATs as reference criterion, for a favourable four-frequency average over 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 6.0 kHz with a cutoff of 20 dB HL, the sensitivity of the EDPTs was 92% and the specificity 62%; a cutoff of 30 dB HL increased the respective values to 98% and 77%.
Conclusions: DPOAEgfs are acceptable for estimating hearing thresholds in individuals with intellectual disability who may have limitations in performing conventional audiometry.
Keywords: DPOAE growth functions; audiometry; distortion product otoacoustic emission; hearing loss; hearing screening; intellectual disability.
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Intellectual Disability Research published by MENCAP and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Bader, K. , Dierkes L., Braun L. H., Gummer A. W., Dalhoff E., and Zelle D.. 2021. “Test‐Retest Reliability of Distortion‐Product Thresholds Compared to Behavioral Auditory Thresholds.” Hearing Research 406: 108232. - PubMed
-
- Boege, P. , and Janssen T.. 2002. “Pure‐Tone Threshold Estimation From Extrapolated Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission I/O‐Functions in Normal and Cochlear Hearing Loss Ears.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111, no. 4: 1810–1818. - PubMed
-
- Bohnert, A. , Müller S., Brantzen P., Keilmann A., and Janssen T.. 2010. “ Hearing Screening in Children Using DPOAE Thresholds and Interactive, Self‐Paced Behavioural Pure‐Tone Thresholds (MAGIC) [Poster presentation].” In NHS 2010 conference Beyond Newborn Hearing Screening: Infant and Childhood Hearing in Science and Clinical Practice. Cernobbio.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
