Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov 6;31(6):568-575.
doi: 10.4274/dir.2025.253361. Epub 2025 Sep 22.

Early prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy among patients with triple-negative breast cancer using an ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram

Affiliations

Early prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy among patients with triple-negative breast cancer using an ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram

Min-Jia Lin et al. Diagn Interv Radiol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate a radiomics nomogram based on early ultrasound (US) imaging for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Methods: This retrospective study included 328 patients with TNBC treated between September 2019 and January 2024, divided into a training cohort (n = 230) and a validation cohort (n = 98). Clinicopathologic data, US features before NAC, tumor volume reduction (TVR) after two cycles of NAC, and radiomics features were collected. Multiple logistic regression was applied to identify the potential predictors of pCR. The efficacy of the nomogram was evaluated through the receiver operating characteristic, calibration, and decision curve analyses. The study was approved by the ethics committee on February 28, 2024, with approval number 2023-SR-799, and the requirement for informed consent was waived.

Results: Twelve features were selected to construct the radiomics signature (RS). The nomogram, incorporating tumor histologic grade, TVR, and RS, yielded an area under the curve of 0.856 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.807-0.905] in the training cohort and 0.836 (95% CI, 0.749-0.923) in the validation cohort, outperforming both the clinico-ultrasonic and RS models. The calibration and decision curves confirmed the nomogram's excellent calibration and clinical utility.

Conclusion: The nomogram, which includes US characteristics, clinical variables, and radiomics features, exhibited satisfactory performance in predicting NAC efficacy in patients with TNBC.

Clinical significance: The US-based radiomics nomogram, incorporating histologic grade, TVR, and RS, shows preliminary clinical application potential for predicting NAC efficacy in patients with TNBC.

Keywords: Triple-negative breast cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; pathologic complete response; radiomics; ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart showing the study exclusion criteria. TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; US, ultrasound.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Radiomics workflow and (b) study flowchart. US, ultrasound; ROI, region of interest.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Grey-scale US images. (a, b) The three largest tumor dimensions in the transverse and longitudinal images before NAC. (c, d) The three largest tumor dimensions in the transverse and longitudinal images after two cycles of NAC. The patient completed neoadjuvant systemic therapy, and surgical pathology confirmed a pCR. (e, f) The three largest tumor dimensions in the transverse and longitudinal images before NAC. (g, h) The three largest tumor dimensions in the transverse and longitudinal images after two cycles of NAC. The patient completed neoadjuvant systemic therapy, and surgical pathology confirmed a non-pCR. US, ultrasound; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; pCR, pathologic complete response.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Heatmap of selected radiomics features from the training cohort (GLSZM, grey level size zone matrix; NGTDM, neighboring gray tone difference matrix). (b) Comparison of Radscores between the pCR and non-pCR groups in the training and validation cohorts. (c) Features selected using LASSO regression. pCR, pathologic complete response; LASSO, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Development of the US-based radiomics nomogram for predicting pCR in TNBC. The nomogram integrates histologic grade, TVR, and RS. US, ultrasound; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer; TVR, tumor volume reduction; RS, radiomics signature.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(a, b) ROC comparisons of the clinico-ultrasonic model, RS model, and radiomics nomogram in the training and validation cohorts. (c, d) Calibration curves of the radiomics nomogram in the training and validation cohorts. (e) Decision curve of the RS model, clinico-ultrasonic model, and radiomics nomogram. ROC, receiver operating characteristic; RS, radiomics signature; pCR, pathologic complete response.

References

    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–263. - PubMed
    1. Jiang YZ, Ma D, Suo C, et al. Genomic and Transcriptomic landscape of triple-negative breast cancers: subtypes and treatment strategies. Cancer Cell. 2019;35(3):428–440. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.02.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carey L, Winer E, Viale G, Cameron D, Gianni L. Triple-negative breast cancer: disease entity or title of convenience? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010;7(12):683–692. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.154. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lehmann BD, Bauer JA, Chen X, et al. Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(7):2750–2767. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foulkes WD, Smith IE, Reis-Filho JS. Triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(20):1938–1948. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1001389. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources