Power and clinical utility of mesopic microperimetry analysis strategies in age-related macular degeneration
- PMID: 40977307
- DOI: 10.1111/aos.70008
Power and clinical utility of mesopic microperimetry analysis strategies in age-related macular degeneration
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluates whether mesopic microperimetry (MMP) provides a more robust measure of retinal function compared to visual acuity (VA) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) clinical trials, with a focus on optimal analysis strategies.
Method: Fellow-eyes of unilateral neovascular AMD were prospectively studied. Presenting VA was measured. The Macular Integrity Assessment Microperimeter (MAIA) was used with a 4 to 2 staircase strategy with a 10° diameter grid containing 37 loci. Three analysis strategies were calculated: the mean of 37 sensitivity thresholds (MS), the per cent reduced threshold (PRT), and the log-transformed candela mean (MS cd log). Sample size requirements were calculated for 12- and 24-month follow-ups using a paired one-sided T-test (α = 0.05, power = 0.80).
Results: N = 123 were analysed (82 (65.5%) females; mean age 74.2 (7.8) years). Ranked high to low, the required sample size at 12 months was: MS (n = 51), MS cd log (n = 52), PRT (n = 139), and VA (n = 203). Similar trends were seen at 24 months, with MS requiring the smallest sample size (n = 85) and VA the largest (n = 1673).
Conclusion: All MMP analysis strategies outperformed VA, and MS required the least number of patients to show significant changes. This trend was consistent for both 12 and 24 months. These findings provide strong statistical arguments for the use of MMP in longitudinal within-subjects clinical trials and suggest that averaging decibels is optimal.
© 2025 The Author(s). Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Altman, D.G. & Royston, P. (2006) The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 332, 1080.
-
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. (2015) Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.
-
- Chang, D.S., Callaway, N.F., Steffen, V., Csaky, K., Guymer, R.H., Birch, D.G. et al. (2024) Macular sensitivity endpoints in geographic atrophy: exploratory analysis of chroma and Spectri clinical trials. Ophthalmol Sci, 4, 100351.
-
- Charng, J., Sanfilippo, P.G., Attia, M.S., Dolliver, M., Arunachalam, S., Chew, A.L. et al. (2020) Interpreting MAIA microperimetry using age‐ and retinal loci‐specific reference thresholds. Translational Vision Science & Technology, 9, 19.
-
- Colijn, J.M., Buitendijk, G.H.S., Prokofyeva, E., Alves, D., Cachulo, M.L., Khawaja, A.P. et al. (2017) Prevalence of age‐related macular degeneration in Europe: the past and the future. Ophthalmology, 124, 1753–1763.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
