Assessing rural populations' barriers to mental healthcare and perceptions towards prescription digital therapeutics: a cross-sectional survey
- PMID: 40978697
- PMCID: PMC12443765
- DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1655446
Assessing rural populations' barriers to mental healthcare and perceptions towards prescription digital therapeutics: a cross-sectional survey
Abstract
Introduction: Prescription Digital Therapeutics (PDTs) hold unique potential to improve mental health in underserved rural areas. However, potential users' perceptions towards PDTs and community-specific differences in barriers to care are not well-understood.
Methods: We conducted an online survey of 351 U.S. adults with ≥1 mental health condition and care-seeking behaviors. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used to evaluate rural and non-rural differences in demographics, social determinants of health, current barriers to mental health treatment, and the perceived value of PDTs. Key limitations of this approach include self-reported rurality and digital access bias associated with online survey distribution.
Results: Barriers to mental healthcare impacted 60% of all rural respondents, and rurality was associated with unique challenges like lower incomes, lower education levels, substantial Medicaid enrollment, and further distances from care. Rural respondents were also more likely to be completely unfamiliar with digital apps for mental health treatment. 89% of all respondents thought PDTs could address at least one barrier to care and about 97% of respondents were likely to use a PDT recommended by their provider.
Discussion: Existing gaps in care and positive perceptions towards PDTs demonstrate unique promise for these modalities to address unmet mental health needs. However, lower PDT familiarity among rural respondents suggests a need for provider intervention and policy reforms.
Keywords: barriers to care; digital health; mental health; mental health equity; prescription digital therapeutics; rural health.
© 2025 Danon, Dunn, Robins, Nagendra, Strand, Palko, Colborn, Menjivar and Saber.
Conflict of interest statement
GD, CD, MR, JS were employed by Innopiphany LLC. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Reinert M, Fritze D, Nguyen T. The State of Mental Health in America. Alexandria, VA: Mental Health America; (2024). Available online at: https://mhanational.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/2024-State-of-Mental-... (Accessed June 24, 2025).
-
- Reinert M, Fritze D, Nguyen T. The State of Mental Health in America. Alexandria, VA: Mental Health America; (2024). Available online at: https://mhanational.org/issues/state-mental-health-america (Accessed June 24, 2025).
-
- Jacobson NC, Quist RE, Lee CM, Marsch LA. Chapter 2—Using digital therapeutics to target gaps and failures in traditional mental health and addiction treatments. In: Jacobson N, Kowatsch T, Marsch L, editors. Digital Therapeutics for Mental Health and Addiction: The State of the Science and Vision for the Future. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; (2023). p. 5–18.
-
- United States Census Bureau. Nation’s urban and rural populations shift following 2020 census (2022). Available online at: Available online at: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/urban-rural-populati... (Accessed June 24, 2025).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
