Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 19;15(41):34274-34281.
doi: 10.1039/d5ra05589j. eCollection 2025 Sep 17.

Molecular dynamics simulations of the sputtering of boron and boron oxide surfaces

Affiliations

Molecular dynamics simulations of the sputtering of boron and boron oxide surfaces

Shokirbek Shermukhamedov et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

We employ classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to study processes governed by particle-surface interactions. The interatomic potential energy functions are described by a neural network potential (NNP) trained on an extensive set of density functional theory (DFT) calculations in a semi-iterative fashion. Potential construction and simulation set up follow the Behler-Parrinello approach. As a specific example we investigate sputtering, reflection, and adsorption phenomena occurring on boron and boron oxide surfaces under the impact of deuterium atoms, systems that reflect recent developments in materials science. Besides the frequent use of boron surfaces as an oxygen-gathering material in technical applications, boron-based compounds will be used in future fusion devices. Understanding their interaction with energetic plasma particles is essential, yet their stability and sputtering behavior at the atomic level have remained largely unexplored. From our simulations, we analyzed sputtering yields, adsorption, and reflection events on both boron and boron oxide surfaces. The production simulations included about 750 atoms and covered a range of incident energies and impact angles. Increasing the deuterium impact energy generally leads to an increase in sputtering yields but with distinct energy-dependent trends. The sputtering yield of boron from boron oxide surfaces remains significantly lower than from surfaces of pristine boron. We use an analytical approach to estimate an effective surface binding energy. The work presented here, especially the various energy- and angle dependent rates, can be used to create a parametric model of the B and B2O3 surfaces under the impact of hot particles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Correlation between DFT-calculated and NNP-predicted atomic energies (left) and forces (right) for the boron–deuterium dataset, accompanied by histograms illustrating the distribution of their values. The structures shown below and at the bottom scatter points provide representative examples corresponding to the distributions presented above.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Simulation cells used in the non-cumulative MD simulations. Left: B(100); right: B2O3(001).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Sputtering yields of boron from a boron surface under bombardment by deuterium (a) and boron atoms (b). Triangles represent our NNP simulations. 0° means perpendicular impact.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Sputtering yields of boron atoms (a) and oxygen atoms (b). For D colored triangles indicate different incident angles. The Eckstein curve given for reference shows yields for pure boron surfaces only.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Deuterium atoms after collision with a boron surface: probabilities of reflection (left), adsorption (middle), and retention (right).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Energy distributions of sputtered boron atoms. The shaded areas represent the normalized yield. The solid lines are lognormal distributions fitted to the data.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Sputtering yields of B, O and B–O from B2O3 surfaces under deuterium bombardment.

References

    1. Brezinsek S. Plasma-surface interaction in the Be/W environment: conclusions drawn from the JET-ILW for ITER. J. Nucl. Mater. 2015;463:11–21.
    1. Neu R. Preparing the scientific basis for an all metal ITER. Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion. 2011;53:124040.
    1. Hino T. Yamashina T. Review on Plasma Facing Materials and Suitable Divertor Configuration of a Fusion Experimental Reactor. Mater. Trans., JIM. 1993;34(11):1106–1110.
    1. Linke J. Du J. Loewenhoff T. Pintsuk G. Spilker B. Steudel I. Wirtz M. Challenges for plasma-facing components in nuclear fusion. Matter Radiat. Extremes. 2019;4:056201.
    1. Shin S. J. Aji L. B. B. Bae J. H. Engwall A. M. Hammons J. A. Taylor G. V. Sohngen L. R. Mirkarimi P. B. Kucheyev S. O. Magnetron sputter deposition of boron carbide in Ne and Ar plasmas. J. Appl. Phys. 2024;135:085303.