Similar articles

• Orienting of visual attention among persons with autism spectrum disorders: reading versus responding to symbolic cues.

  Landry O, Mitchell PL, Burack JA. Landry O, et al. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;50(7):862-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02049.x. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009. PMID: 19527316
• Visuospatial attention is guided by both the symbolic value and the spatial proximity of selected arrows.

  Pratt J, Radulescu P, Guo RM, Hommel B. Pratt J, et al. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct;36(5):1321-4. doi: 10.1037/a0019996. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010. PMID: 20873941
• The functional role of alternation advantage in the sequence effect of symbolic cueing with nonpredictive arrow cues.

  Qian Q, Song M, Shinomori K, Wang F. Qian Q, et al. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Oct;74(7):1430-6. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0337-5. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012. PMID: 22718205
• EFFECTS OF CONTROL-DISPLAY COMPATIBILITY AND MONITORING CUES ON MULTIPLE-TASK PERFORMANCE.

  SMITH S, FARRELL RJ, GONZALEZ BK. SMITH S, et al. Percept Mot Skills. 1965 Jun;20:781-5. doi: 10.2466/pms.1965.20.3.781. Percept Mot Skills. 1965. PMID: 14313994 No abstract available.
• Effects of intentional movement preparation on response times to symbolic and imitative cues.

  Naish KR, Rajagobal A, Galang CM, Sartori L, Obhi SS. Naish KR, et al. Exp Brain Res. 2017 Mar;235(3):753-761. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4837-8. Epub 2016 Nov 19. Exp Brain Res. 2017. PMID: 27866264