The Pakistan Palatal Fistula Difficulty Index (PPFDI): Development and Initial Validation of a Novel Scoring Index for Surgical Complexity and Referral Guidance
- PMID: 40986822
- DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000011991
The Pakistan Palatal Fistula Difficulty Index (PPFDI): Development and Initial Validation of a Novel Scoring Index for Surgical Complexity and Referral Guidance
Abstract
Palatal fistulae remain the most common complication following cleft palate repair, with recent studies reporting incidence rates ranging from 2% to 35%. Existing classification systems offer limited guidance on surgical complexity or referral pathways. This study developed and validated the Pakistan Palatal Fistula Difficulty Index (PPFDI), a novel scoring system designed to quantify fistula complexity based on 6 domains: location, size, configuration, number of fistulae, recurrence history, and velopharyngeal function. A 3-tiered framework was proposed to guide referral based on complexity level and surgeon experience. Each domain was scored on a 3-point ordinal scale, yielding a total score range of 6 to 18. Content and face validity were established through a modified Delphi process involving 30 expert cleft surgeons, with all 6 domains achieving ≥70% agreement. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using standardized, anonymized clinical case files (n=30) independently scored by 4 senior cleft surgeons. The PPFDI demonstrated strong inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.87, 95% CI: 0.87-0.95), with domain-specific ICCs ranging from 0.78 to 0.92. The mean PPFDI score was 11.1 (SD=2.9), with 43.3% of cases classified as high complexity (score ≥12). Agreement between PPFDI-informed referral tier and clinician-determined referral need was 91.7% (Cohen kappa=0.81), indicating excellent alignment. The PPFDI offers a reliable and clinically meaningful method to stratify palatal fistula complexity and may support more structured decision-making in both low-resource and high-resource settings. Further validation through multicenter studies and correlation with surgical outcomes is warranted to confirm its broader clinical applicability.
Keywords: Cleft lip and palate; fistula classification; palatal fistula; palatoplasty; referral guidance; surgical complexity; surgical outcomes.
Copyright © 2025 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Buller M, Jodeh D, Qamar F, et al. Cleft palate fistula: a review. Eplasty 2023;23:e7.
-
- Hardwicke JT, Landini G, Richard BM. Fistula incidence after primary cleft palate repair: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134:618e–627e
-
- Daniels KM, Yang Yu E, Maine RG, et al. Palatal fistula risk after primary palatoplasty: a retrospective comparison of a Humanitarian Organization and Tertiary Hospitals. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2018;55:807–813.
-
- Ahmed MK, Maganzini AL, Marantz PR, et al. Risk of persistent palatal fistula in patients with cleft palate. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015;17:126–130.
-
- Tse RW, Siebold B. Cleft palate repair: description of an approach, its evolution, and analysis of postoperative fistulas. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;141:1201–1214.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources