Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 23.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000011991. Online ahead of print.

The Pakistan Palatal Fistula Difficulty Index (PPFDI): Development and Initial Validation of a Novel Scoring Index for Surgical Complexity and Referral Guidance

Affiliations

The Pakistan Palatal Fistula Difficulty Index (PPFDI): Development and Initial Validation of a Novel Scoring Index for Surgical Complexity and Referral Guidance

Muhammad Daiem et al. J Craniofac Surg. .

Abstract

Palatal fistulae remain the most common complication following cleft palate repair, with recent studies reporting incidence rates ranging from 2% to 35%. Existing classification systems offer limited guidance on surgical complexity or referral pathways. This study developed and validated the Pakistan Palatal Fistula Difficulty Index (PPFDI), a novel scoring system designed to quantify fistula complexity based on 6 domains: location, size, configuration, number of fistulae, recurrence history, and velopharyngeal function. A 3-tiered framework was proposed to guide referral based on complexity level and surgeon experience. Each domain was scored on a 3-point ordinal scale, yielding a total score range of 6 to 18. Content and face validity were established through a modified Delphi process involving 30 expert cleft surgeons, with all 6 domains achieving ≥70% agreement. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using standardized, anonymized clinical case files (n=30) independently scored by 4 senior cleft surgeons. The PPFDI demonstrated strong inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.87, 95% CI: 0.87-0.95), with domain-specific ICCs ranging from 0.78 to 0.92. The mean PPFDI score was 11.1 (SD=2.9), with 43.3% of cases classified as high complexity (score ≥12). Agreement between PPFDI-informed referral tier and clinician-determined referral need was 91.7% (Cohen kappa=0.81), indicating excellent alignment. The PPFDI offers a reliable and clinically meaningful method to stratify palatal fistula complexity and may support more structured decision-making in both low-resource and high-resource settings. Further validation through multicenter studies and correlation with surgical outcomes is warranted to confirm its broader clinical applicability.

Keywords: Cleft lip and palate; fistula classification; palatal fistula; palatoplasty; referral guidance; surgical complexity; surgical outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Buller M, Jodeh D, Qamar F, et al. Cleft palate fistula: a review. Eplasty 2023;23:e7.
    1. Hardwicke JT, Landini G, Richard BM. Fistula incidence after primary cleft palate repair: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134:618e–627e
    1. Daniels KM, Yang Yu E, Maine RG, et al. Palatal fistula risk after primary palatoplasty: a retrospective comparison of a Humanitarian Organization and Tertiary Hospitals. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2018;55:807–813.
    1. Ahmed MK, Maganzini AL, Marantz PR, et al. Risk of persistent palatal fistula in patients with cleft palate. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015;17:126–130.
    1. Tse RW, Siebold B. Cleft palate repair: description of an approach, its evolution, and analysis of postoperative fistulas. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;141:1201–1214.

LinkOut - more resources