Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep;21(9):e70703.
doi: 10.1002/alz.70703.

One-carbon metabolism modulates miR-29a-DNA methylation crosstalk in Alzheimer's disease

Affiliations

One-carbon metabolism modulates miR-29a-DNA methylation crosstalk in Alzheimer's disease

Tiziana Raia et al. Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD)'s multifactorial nature stresses the role of epigenetics in affecting different pathological pathways. We demonstrated that one-carbon metabolism epigenetically impacts AD-like phenotype. Here, we investigated the crosstalk between methylation and microRNAs in AD.

Methods: We altered one-carbon metabolism to induce hypo- and hyper-methylation, in SK-N-BE neuroblastoma cells and TgCRND8 mice. miRNAs were profiled through a polymerase chain reaction array, then we focused on miR-29a expression and methylation of its genomic locus. Finally, we assessed miR-29a expression and methylation in the brain of AD subjects.

Results: MiR-29a was repressed in hypomethylating and expressed in hypermethylating conditions. The expression of miR-29a and of its target, BACE1, was inversely correlated.

Discussion: We demonstrated for the first time that miR-29a is modulated by one-carbon metabolism through DNA methylation, disclosing the molecular mechanisms regulating BACE1 expression in AD. These data confirm miR-29a's protective role in AD and support miR-29a as a potential biomarker for AD.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; DNA methylation; epigenetics; microRNAs; mir‐29a; non‐CPG methylation; one‐carbon metabolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Tiziana Raia, Luiza Diniz Ferreira Borges, Rosaria A. Cavallaro, Isidre Ferrer, Stefano Cinti, Mariano Bizzarri, and Marco Lucarelli have nothing to disclose. Andrea Fuso is a consultant at “Gnosis by Lesaffre.” Author disclosures are available in the supporting information

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
miR‐29a expression in AD models. Effects of hypermethylating (SAM‐supplementation) and hypomethylating (B‐deficient) treatments in SK‐N‐BE cell line (A) and TgCNRD8 mice (B). miR‐29a expression in post mortem human brain samples (C). Bar plots show the relative amounts of the miR‐29a cDNA normalized to the mean RNU6‐SNORD68 internal reference obtained using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction on the y axis. Data represent the mean ± standard error of the mean. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Cell cultures, N = 3; mice, N = 12; human samples, N = 15. AD, Alzheimer's disease; SAM, S‐adenosylmethionine.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
miR‐29a transfection in SK‐N‐BE cells. Expression of miR‐29a in SK‐N‐BE cells transfected for 48 hours with 20 µM mimic‐ or inhibitor‐miR29a (A). Effects of miR‐29a transfections on BACE1 mRNA expression (B). Bar plots show the relative amounts of the target genes normalized to the mean β‐ACTIN‐GAPDH internal reference obtained using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction on the y axis. Data represent the mean ± standard error of the mean. ***p < 0.001; N = 3.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
miR‐29a methylation in SK‐N‐BE cells. miR‐29a DNA CpG and non‐CpG methylation patterns in SK‐N‐BE cells. Histograms in (A) Ctrl, (B) Ctrl+SAM, (C) B vitamin deficiency, and (D) B‐def + SAM show methylation % (y axis) of each cytosine; labels on x axis indicate the cytosine position on the reference sequence of the DNA locus hosting the miR‐29a sequence. CpG cytosines are indicated by a dot over the related columns. Data represent the mean ± SEM *p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; N = 3. Histogram in (E) shows the average methylation % over the total cytosines (y axis) as derived from the respective data and grouped in all the cytosines (TOT), CpG moieties (CpG), and non‐CpG moieties (non‐CpG). Data represent the mean ± SEM versus the related controls (light gray columns). *p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; N = 3. SAM, S‐adenosylmethionine; SEM, standard error of the mean.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
miR‐29a methylation in TgCRND8 mice. miR‐29a DNA CpG and non‐CpG methylation patterns in brain (prefrontal cortex) from TgCRND8 mice. Histograms in (A) Ctrl, (B) Ctrl+SAM, (C) B vitamin deficiency, and (D) B‐def + SAM show methylation % (y axis) of each cytosine; labels on x axis indicate the cytosine position on the reference sequence of the DNA locus hosting the miR‐29a sequence. CpG cytosines are indicated by a dot over the related columns. Data represent the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; N = 3. Histogram in (E) shows the average methylation % over the total cytosines (y axis) as derived from the respective data and grouped in all the cytosines (TOT), CpG moieties (CpG), and non‐CpG moieties (non‐CpG). Data represent the mean ± SEM vs. the related controls (light gray columns) *p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; N = 3. SAM, S‐adenosylmethionine; SEM, standard error of the mean.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
miR‐29a methylation in post mortem human brain. miR‐29a DNA CpG and non‐CpG methylation patterns in post mortem human brain (prefrontal cortex) from healthy and AD subjects. Histograms in (A) Healthy controls, (B) AD Braak stage I‐II, and (C) AD Braak stage V‐VI show methylation % (y axis) of each cytosine; labels on x axis indicate the cytosine position on the reference sequence of the DNA locus hosting the miR‐29a sequence. CpG cytosines are indicated by a dot over the related columns. Data represent the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; N = 3. Histogram in (E) shows the average methylation % over the total cytosines (y axis) as derived from the respective data and grouped in all the cytosines (TOT), CpG moieties (CpG), and non‐CpG moieties (non‐CpG). Data represent the mean ± SEM versus the related controls (light gray columns). *p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; N = 3. AD, Alzheimer's disease; SEM, standard error of the mean.

References

    1. Parker J, Moris JM, Goodman LC, et al. A multifactorial lens on risk factors promoting the progression of Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res. 2024;1846:149262. - PubMed
    1. Contador I, Buch‐Vicente B, Del Ser T, et al. Charting Alzheimer's disease and dementia: epidemiological insights, risk factors and prevention pathways. J Clin Med. 2024;13(14):4100. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bocti C. Is simpler always better? The case for going beyond the amyloid hypothesis in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;100(3):787‐789. - PubMed
    1. Castellani RJ, Jamshidi P, Plascencia‐Villa G, Perry G. The amyloid cascade hypothesis: a conclusion in search of support. Am J Pathol. 2024;S0002‐9440(24):00407‐00403. - PubMed
    1. Tangavelou K, Bhaskar K. The mechanistic link between tau‐driven proteotoxic stress and cellular senescence in Alzheimer's disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(22):12335. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources