Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 23;30(1):852.
doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-03130-0.

Impact of anti-osteoporotic treatments on hyperlipidemia risk in osteoporosis patients: evidence from a population-based retrospective cohort study

Affiliations

Impact of anti-osteoporotic treatments on hyperlipidemia risk in osteoporosis patients: evidence from a population-based retrospective cohort study

Hui-Hsia Hsieh et al. Eur J Med Res. .

Abstract

Background: In this population-based retrospective cohort study, we investigated the relationship between osteoporosis and the risk of hyperlipidemia, the main risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Despite extensive research on both conditions, the association between osteoporosis and hyperlipidemia remains unclear, particularly in Asian populations.

Methods: Using information from Taiwan's Longitudinal Generation Tracking Database, we conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study spanning 2000-2021. Patients in the comparison cohort were chosen at random and frequency-matched in a 1:1 ratio based on age, sex, month, and year of the index date. Both cohorts were monitored from the index date until a new diagnosis of hyperlipidemia was established. Data on baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and prescription of anti-osteoporotic treatment (AOTs) were gathered.

Results: The osteoporosis cohort consisted of 67,628 patients aged ≤ 34 years or older, diagnosed with osteoporosis, and without a history of hyperlipidemia. With a mean follow-up of 8.81 years and 9.78 years, respectively, the total incidence of hyperlipidemia was 36.7 (per 1000 person-years) for the osteoporosis cohort and 28.4 for the comparison cohort, after controlling for age, sex, and comorbidities. Without treatment, the hazard ratio (HR) for developing hyperlipidemia was 1.58 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54-1.62) for the osteoporosis cohort compared with the comparison cohort. The risk of hyperlipidemia was considerably reduced in patients with osteoporosis who received most types of AOTs [adjusted HR, ≤ 0.31] compared with those who did not receive any of these AOTs.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest a significant association between osteoporosis and increased risk of hyperlipidemia in Asian populations, and highlight the potential protective role of AOTs against hyperlipidemia. These insights could inform clinical strategies to manage patients with osteoporosis and mitigate their risk of CVD.

Keywords: Anti-osteoporotic treatments; Cohort study; Hyperlipidemia; Osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Informed consent and ethical approval: The NHIRD encrypts the patients’ personal information to protect their privacy. It also provides researchers with anonymized identification numbers connected to key claim information such as sex, date of birth, medical services used, and prescriptions. Therefore, patient informed consent was not required to access NHIRD. To satisfy the criteria for exemption, the China Medical University Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) issued a clearance [CMUH112-REC1-117(CR-2)] in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The IRB Review Board waived the requirement for permission. Human ethics and consent to participate declarations: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cummulative incidence of hyperlipidemia compared between with and without osteoporosis using the Kaplan–Meier method. Case group mean follow-up years 8.81 (SD = 5.93). Control group mean follow-up years 9.78 (SD = 5.96)

References

    1. Tu KN, Lie JD, Wan CKV, et al. Osteoporosis: a review of treatment options. P T. 2018;43:92–104. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen YY, Wang WW, Yang L, et al. Association between lipid profiles and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22:1–9. - PubMed
    1. Remmers SJA, de Wildt BWM, Vis MAM, et al. Osteoblast-osteoclast co-cultures: a systematic review and map of available literature. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0257724. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agrawal AC, Garg AK. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Indian J Orthop. 2023;57:45–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cao L, Wu W, Deng X, et al. Association between total cholesterol and total bone mineral density in US adults: National health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES), 2011–2018. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18:40. - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources