Effect of Diabetes Mellitus on Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 40988448
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.70190
Effect of Diabetes Mellitus on Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) or Replacement (TARV) is a widely established treatment for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) in patients with high or intermediate surgical risk. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is prevalent in TAVR patients and is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, which may elevate procedural risks. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched. A random-effects model was applied, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and a 5% significance level. Statistical analyses were performed using RStudio version 4.4.1. Twelve studies with 214,444 patients were included, comprising 74,294 diabetic and 140,150 nondiabetic individuals. The analysis revealed no significant differences in all-cause mortality, procedure mortality, 30-day mortality, or complications such as bleeding, myocardial infarction, and major complications. However, 1-year mortality was significantly higher in the diabetic group (RR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.08-2.13). Diabetic patients were at higher risk for renal injury (RR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.40-1.51) and lower risk of stroke (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.83-0.99). The length of hospital stay and other major complications showed no significant differences. There was an increased risk of 1-year mortality and renal injury in diabetic patients undergoing TAVI compared to non-diabetics. Surprisingly, the risk for developing stroke in the diabetic group was significantly lower. In any case, the study emphasizes the need for tighter DM control to decrease the risk of such complications in the future.
Keywords: TAVI; TAVR; complications; diabetes mellitus; meta‐analysis; mortality.
© 2025 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
-
- C. M. Rangel, M. Grinberg, R. C. Maranhão, and L. I. Ventura, “Estenose aórtica e doença coronariana: análise dos fatores de risco,” Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia 87, no. 2 (2006): 115–120.
-
- M. J. Schweiger, K. K. Chawla, and A. Lotfi, “Severe Aortic Stenosis: More Than an Imaging Diagnosis,” American Journal of Medicine 135, no. 5 (2022): 566–571.
-
- S. Coffey, B. Cox, and M. J. A. Williams, “The Prevalence, Incidence, Progression, and Risks of Aortic Valve Sclerosis,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 63, no. 25 Pt A (2014): 2852–2861.
-
- G. Benfari, B. Essayagh, H. I. Michelena, et al., “Severe Aortic Stenosis: Secular Trends of Incidence and Outcomes,” European Heart Journal 45, no. 21 (2024): 1877–1886.
-
- C. R. Smith, M. B. Leon, M. J. Mack, et al., “Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic‐Valve Replacement in High‐Risk Patients,” New England Journal of Medicine 364, no. 23 (2011): 2187–2198.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
