Association of genetic scores related to insulin resistance with neurological outcomes in ancestrally diverse cohorts from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program
- PMID: 40993182
- PMCID: PMC12460837
- DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-08674-9
Association of genetic scores related to insulin resistance with neurological outcomes in ancestrally diverse cohorts from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program
Abstract
To better characterize the potential biological mechanisms underlying insulin resistance (IR) and dementia, we derive cross-population and population specific polygenic scores [PSs] for fasting insulin and IR-related partitioned PSs [pPSs]. We conduct a cross-sectional study of the associations of these genetic scores with neurological outcomes in >17k participants (36% men, mean age 55 yrs) from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program (50% Non-Hispanic White, 23% Black/African American, 21% Hispanic/Latino American, and 4% Asian American). We report significant negative associations (P < 0.002) of the cross-population (P = 1.3 × 10-5) and European (PEA = 3.0 × 10-8) fasting insulin PSs with total cranial volume, and of a metabolic syndrome European PS with general cognitive function (BEA = -0.13, PEA = 0.0002) and lateral ventricular volume (BEA = 0.09, PEA = 0.002). We identify suggestive negative associations (P < 0.007) of metabolic syndrome and obesity pPSs with general cognitive function, and of lipodystrophy pPSs with total cranial volume. A higher genetic predisposition to IR is associated with lower brain size, and a genetic predisposition to specific IR-related type 2 diabetes subtypes, such as metabolic syndrome and mechanisms of IR mediated through obesity and lipodystrophy, is potentially involved in cognitive decline.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: L.M.R. and S.S.R. are consultants for the TOPMed Administrative Coordinating Center (through Westat). B.M.P. serves on the Steering Committee of the Yale Open Data Access Project funded by Johnson & Johnson. All the other authors declare that they have no competing interests. The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; the National Institute on Aging; or the National Institutes of Health. Ethics approval and consent to participate: All study participants provided informed consent, and each study was approved by their respective institutional review boards.
Figures
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- KL2 TR002646/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- R00 AG066849/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- RF1 AG059421/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- U01 HL120393/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 HL105756/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AG033193/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- U01 AG058589/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AG059727/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- P30 AG066546/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- R21 AG075791/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- R01 HL151855/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AG082360/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AG054076/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- R01 HL120393/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 NS125513/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AG049607/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- R01 HL117626/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- P30 AG072972/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- K24 HL157960/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
