Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 23;6(5):e70145.
doi: 10.1002/jha2.70145. eCollection 2025 Oct.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Triple-Class-Exposed and BCMA-Exposed Multiple Myeloma Within the United States

Affiliations

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Triple-Class-Exposed and BCMA-Exposed Multiple Myeloma Within the United States

Hira S Mian et al. EJHaem. .

Abstract

Introduction: A novel therapy for heavily pretreated triple-class-exposed multiple myeloma (TCE MM) is B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted immunotherapy. While the number of TCE+BCMA-exposed patients is growing, real-world data for this group are limited.

Methods: We present real-world data from patients with TCE+BCMA-exposed MM who initiated a subsequent line of therapy (LOT) using a US-based claims database, Komodo's Healthcare Map.

Results: We identified 656 TCE+BCMA-exposed patients; mean age was 66.5 years. Time from MM diagnosis to index was 5.4 years; mean number of prior LOTs was 5.9. The most prevalent prior therapy received within each drug class was daratumumab (98.5%), pomalidomide (86.0%), carfilzomib (85.8%) and belantamab mafodotin (74.5%). A total of 137 different subsequent treatment regimens were observed following TCE+BCMA exposure; the most common regimen was teclistamab (10.4%). The top three targeted agents within the subsequent regimen were carfilzomib (20.2%), pomalidomide (20.1%) and bortezomib (16.6%). Among this TCE+BCMA-exposed population who received subsequent treatment, the median time to next treatment or death was 6.8 (95% CI, 6.1-7.5) months; time to treatment discontinuation or death was 3.5 (95% CI, 3.2-3.7) months.

Conclusion: This first real-world analysis of patients with heavily pretreated TCE+BCMA-exposed MM shows poor clinical outcomes, frequent therapy retreatment and no standard-of-care, highlighting the need for novel treatments.

Clinical trial registration: The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.

Keywords: BCMA; clinical outcomes; multiple myeloma; real‐world; triple‐class–exposed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

H.S.M. received honoraria for consultancy from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, FORUS Therapeutics Inc., Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi and Takeda; and received research funding from Janssen and Pfizer. J.S.H. is a current employee and equity holder of Johnson & Johnson and holds a patent assigned to Johnson & Johnson. H.H.L. was an employee of Johnson & Johnson at the time of the study and held stock options. H.H.L. is a current employee of Takeda. A.Z.F. is a current employee of Johnson & Johnson and holds stock options. S.P. was an employee of Johnson & Johnson at the time of the study and held stock options. S.P. is a current employee of AbbVie. X.Z. is a current employee of Johnson & Johnson and holds stock options. R.F. served as a consultant for AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Apple, Bristol Meyers Squibb/Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Pfizer, RA Capital, Regeneron and Sanofi; served on a scientific advisory board for Caris Life Sciences; served on the board of directors for Antengene; and has a current patent for fluorescence in situ hybridisation in multiple myeloma (∼$2000/year).

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study design for patients with TCE+BCMA‐exposed MM. BCMA, B‐cell maturation antigen; CAR‐T, chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell; LOT, line of therapy; MM, multiple myeloma; TCE, triple‐class–exposed; TTD, time to discontinuation; TTNT, time to next treatment. aIndex date was defined as the start date of the subsequent LOT following TCE+BCMA exposure (or CAR‐T infusion date for CAR‐T‐containing LOTs). bThe follow‐up period was defined as the time from the index date to the last claim date, death or the end of the study period, whichever was earlier.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Summary of attrition and cohort selection for patients with MM with prior TCE+BCMA exposure and ≥ 4 prior LOTs. BCMA, B‐cell maturation antigen; HCPCS, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System; ICD‐9‐CM, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification; ICD‐10‐CM, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification; IMiD, immunomodulatory drug; LOT, line of therapy; mAb, monoclonal antibody; MM, multiple myeloma; PI, proteasome inhibitor; TCE, triple‐class–exposed. aRetention percentages are calculated from the total number of patients from the previous step. bTCE was defined as ≥ 1 PI, ≥ 1 IMiD and ≥ 1 anti‐CD38 mAb between the study start date and intake end date. cCodes used for clinical trials were as follows: ICD‐9‐CM: V70.7; ICD‐10‐CM: Z00.6; HCPCS: S9988, S9990, S9991, S9992, S9994, S9996; HCPCS modifier: Q0, Q1.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
TTNT and TTD in patients with MM with prior TCE+BCMA exposure and ≥ 4 prior LOTs. BCMA, B‐cell maturation antigen; CI, confidence interval; LOT, line of therapy; MM, multiple myeloma; TCE, triple‐class–exposed; TTD, time to discontinuation; TTNT, time to next treatment. aTTNT was defined as the time from the index date to death or the initiation of a next LOT. bTTD was defined as the time from the index date to death or the discontinuation of the index LOT. cDue to Komodo Health's patient deidentification policies, data including 1–10 patients were masked.

References

    1. Elbezanti W. O., Challagundla K. B., Jonnalagadda S. C., Budak‐Alpdogan T., and Pandey M. K., “Past, Present, and a Glance Into the Future of Multiple Myeloma Treatment,” Pharmaceuticals 16 (2023): 415. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Granger K., Gaffney K. J., and Davis J. A., “Newly Approved and Forthcoming T‐Cell‐Redirecting Bispecific Antibodies for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma,” Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice 29 (2023): 722–726. - PubMed
    1. Yong K., Delforge M., Driessen C., et al., “Multiple Myeloma: Patient Outcomes in Real‐World Practice,” British Journal of Haematology 175 (2016): 252–264. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fonseca R., Harper J., Le H., et al., “P‐257 Real‐World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Triple‐Class Exposed (TCE) Multiple Myeloma (MM),” supplement, Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia 23, no. S2 (2023): S177–S178.
    1. Rifkin R. M., Harper J. S., Le H. H., et al., “Real‐World Clinical Outcomes Among Triple‐Class Exposed Multiple Myeloma Patients and Subgroups in the US Oncology Network,” Blood 142, no. S1 (2023): 7362.

LinkOut - more resources