Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 25.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-12029-7. Online ahead of print.

Deep learning reconstruction for temporomandibular joint MRI: diagnostic interchangeability, image quality, and scan time reduction

Affiliations

Deep learning reconstruction for temporomandibular joint MRI: diagnostic interchangeability, image quality, and scan time reduction

Gyu-Dong Jo et al. Eur Radiol. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic interchangeability, image quality, and scan time of deep learning (DL)-reconstructed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with conventional MRI for the temporomandibular joint (TMJ).

Materials and methods: Patients with suspected TMJ disorder underwent sagittal proton density-weighted (PDW) and T2-weighted fat-suppressed (T2W FS) MRI using both conventional and DL reconstruction protocols in a single session. Three oral radiologists independently assessed disc shape, disc position, and joint effusion. Diagnostic interchangeability for these findings was evaluated by comparing interobserver agreement, with equivalence defined as a 95% confidence interval (CI) within ±5%. Qualitative image quality (sharpness, noise, artifacts, overall) was rated on a 5-point scale. Quantitative image quality was assessed by measuring the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the condyle, disc, and background air. Image quality scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and SNR/CNR using paired t-tests. Scan times were directly compared.

Results: A total of 176 TMJs from 88 patients (mean age, 37 ± 16 years; 43 men) were analyzed. DL-reconstructed MRI demonstrated diagnostic equivalence to conventional MRI for disc shape, position, and effusion (equivalence indices < 3%; 95% CIs within ±5%). DL reconstruction significantly reduced noise in PDW and T2W FS sequences (p < 0.05) while maintaining sharpness and artifact levels. SNR and CNR were significantly improved (p < 0.05), except for disc SNR in PDW (p = 0.189). Scan time was reduced by 49.2%.

Conclusion: DL-reconstructed TMJ MRI is diagnostically interchangeable with conventional MRI, offering improved image quality with a shorter scan time.

Key points: Question Long MRI scan times in patients with temporomandibular disorders can increase pain and motion-related artifacts, often compromising image quality in diagnostic settings. Findings DL reconstruction is diagnostically interchangeable with conventional MRI for assessing disc shape, disc position, and effusion, while improving image quality and reducing scan time. Clinical relevance DL reconstruction enables faster and more tolerable TMJ MRI workflows without compromising diagnostic accuracy, facilitating broader adoption in clinical settings where long scan times and motion artifacts often limit diagnostic efficiency.

Keywords: Deep learning; Image enhancement; Magnetic resonance imaging; Temporomandibular Joint; Temporomandibular joint disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standards. Guarantor: The scientific guarantor of this publication is Sang-Sun Han. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this manuscript. Statistics and biometry: No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. Informed consent: Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University Dental Hospital. Ethical approval: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from Yonsei University Dental Hospital (IRB No. 2-2024-0076). Study subjects or cohorts overlap: No overlap with previously published cohorts. Methodology: Retrospective Observational Single-center study

References

    1. Tomas X, Pomes J, Berenguer J et al (2006) MR imaging of temporomandibular joint dysfunction: a pictorial review. Radiographics 26:765–781 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Valesan LF, Da-Cas CD, Réus JC et al (2021) Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 25:441–453 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Park JW, Song HH, Roh HS, Kim YK, Lee JY (2012) Correlation between clinical diagnosis based on RDC/TMD and MRI findings of TMJ internal derangement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:103–108 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mouchoux J, Sojka F, Kauffmann P, Dechent P, Meyer-Marcotty P, Quast A (2024) An automatic tracking method to measure the mandibula movement during real time MRI. Sci Rep 14:24125. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-74285-9 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Higuchi K, Chiba M, Sai Y et al (2020) Relationship between temporomandibular joint pain and magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:230–236 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources