UK Biobank-centric advances in brain age prediction: a comprehensive review
- PMID: 40997331
- DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2025-0055
UK Biobank-centric advances in brain age prediction: a comprehensive review
Abstract
With the accelerating global population aging, establishing effective brain health assessment systems has emerged as a critical challenge in public health. Neuroimaging-based brain age prediction, serving as a potential biomarker for evaluating individual brain aging, has achieved remarkable breakthroughs in recent years. However, the accuracy of current brain age prediction models remains substantially dependent on the quality and representativeness of their training datasets. Consequently, constructing larger-scale, population-representative, and high-quality datasets is essential for enhancing the reliability of brain age prediction. This systematic review synthesizes findings from 70 peer-reviewed studies (2014-2024) that utilized the UK Biobank (UKB) for brain age prediction, focusing on paradigm-shifting advancements in machine learning and deep learning algorithms. We comprehensively analyze influential factors associated with brain age and their clinical implications, while critically evaluating the unique advantages and inherent limitations of the UKB dataset in this research domain. Furthermore, this work proposes future research directions to address existing methodological gaps and enhance clinical applicability. This study systematically elucidates the advancements in brain age prediction research based on the UKB dataset, aiming to promote deeper exploration in this field and provide theoretical foundations and practical guidance for the precise diagnosis and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, as well as the formulation of individualized intervention strategies.
Keywords: UK Biobank; aging-related factors; brain age prediction; deep learning; machine learning.
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
References
-
- Ataman, B., Boulting, G.L., Harmin, D.A., Yang, M.G., Baker-Salisbury, M., Yap, E.L., Malik, A.N., Mei, K., Rubin, A.A., Spiegel, I., et al.. (2016). Evolution of osteocrin as an activity-regulated factor in the primate brain. Nature 539: 242–247, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20111 . - DOI
-
- Baecker, L., Dafflon, J., da Costa, P.F., Garcia-Dias, R., Vieira, S., Scarpazza, C., Calhoun, V.D., Sato, J.R., Mechelli, A., and Pinaya, W.H.L. (2021). Brain age prediction: a comparison between machine learning models using region- and voxel-based morphometric data. Hum. Brain Mapp. 42: 2332–2346, https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25368 . - DOI
-
- Bakkour, A., Morris, J.C., Wolk, D.A., and Dickerson, B.C. (2013). The effects of aging and Alzheimer’s disease on cerebral cortical anatomy: specificity and differential relationships with cognition. NeuroImage 76: 332–344, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.059 . - DOI
-
- Bass, C., Silva, M.D., Sudre, C., Williams, L.Z.J., Sousa, H.S., Tudosiu, P.D., Alfaro-Almagro, F., Fitzgibbon, S.P., Glasser, M.F., Smith, S.M., et al.. (2023). ICAM-Reg: interpretable classification and regression with feature attribution for mapping neurological phenotypes in individual scans. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 42: 959–970, https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2022.3221890 . - DOI
-
- Beck, D., de Lange, A.G., Gurholt, T.P., Voldsbekk, I., Maximov, I.I., Subramaniapillai, S., Schindler, L., Hindley, G., Leonardsen, E.H., Rahman, Z., et al. (2024). Dissecting unique and common variance across body and brain health indicators using age prediction. Hum. Brain Mapp. 45: e26685, https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26685 . - DOI