Analytical Validation of Blood-Derived Tumor Mutation Burden (bTMB) Assays: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the BLOODPAC bTMB Analytical Validation Working Group
- PMID: 40998494
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.06.008
Analytical Validation of Blood-Derived Tumor Mutation Burden (bTMB) Assays: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the BLOODPAC bTMB Analytical Validation Working Group
Abstract
Immunotherapies have changed the treatment paradigm for patients with advanced and metastatic solid tumors, with tumor mutation burden representing one approach to identify patients who may experience clinical benefit. Circulating tumor DNA-based approaches have been developed for comprehensive analyses of clinically actionable biomarkers; however, blood tumor mutation burden (bTMB) represents a novel, complex biomarker. Although the clinical utility of bTMB is an evolving area of active development and has not led to consistent conclusions across studies, robust analytical validation of the underlying test is important to ensure that technical and biological limitations do not confound clinical interpretation of these results. To this end, the BLOODPAC bTMB Analytical Validation Working Group sought to identify key technical and biological issues associated with analytical validation of bTMB tests, along with a conceptual framework to address these challenges. This publication provides guidance for device manufacturers to demonstrate analytical performance of their test with the understanding that these data would be accompanied by an appropriately designed clinical validation study to demonstrate performance within the intended use population. Therefore, the specific algorithm to determine the bTMB result, along with the associated cutoff, is out of scope of this Perspective. Device manufacturers should also ensure that appropriate pre-analytical variables are accounted for and methods are incorporated to differentiate tumor-specific alterations from those associated with germline polymorphisms or clonal hematopoiesis.
Copyright © 2025 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure Statement The work described here was done through the BLOODPAC Consortium, which is a not-for-profit consortium consisting of members from industry, academia, not-for-profits, and US government agencies, including companies that sell liquid biopsy assays, companies that use liquid biopsy assays as companion diagnostics, organizations that do research related to liquid biopsies, organizations that conduct clinical trials involving liquid biopsies, and agencies that develop policies and procedures related to liquid biopsies. In addition, some of the authors are employed by companies in the liquid biopsy field, have stock in companies in the liquid biopsy field, or consult with companies in the liquid biopsy field. The authors worked together collaboratively to develop consensus opinions, and the authors do not have any particular or specific conflict with the work described in this article, beyond those enumerated in the rest of this statement. J.B. is an employee at Bristol Myers Squibb; M.S. is an employee at Labcorp; A.T.A. is an employee at LGC Clinical Diagnostics; K.M.D. is a former employee at Guardant Health; J.D. is an employee at Labcorp, J.H.G. is a former employee at Quest Diagnostics; L.G. is an employee at Illumina; J.S.L. is an employee at Illumina; E.M. is an employee at Foundation Medicine; K.L.M. is an employee at Illumina; D.M. is an employee at LGC Clinical Diagnostics; T.P. is an employee at Illumina; S.S. is an employee at Guardant Health; D.S. is an employee at AstraZeneca; and P.W. is an employee at Illumina. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical