Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 22;15(9):344.
doi: 10.3390/nursrep15090344.

Nurses' Attitudes, Environmental Perceptions and Involvement in Research: A Multisite Study

Affiliations

Nurses' Attitudes, Environmental Perceptions and Involvement in Research: A Multisite Study

Amanda J Hessels et al. Nurs Rep. .

Abstract

Background: Although evidence-based practice is widely promoted in nursing, direct care nurses remain underrepresented in research activities. This study aimed to assess nurses' attitudes toward research, their perceptions of the organizational research environment, and their levels of involvement, as well as identify key barriers and facilitators to engagement within a comprehensive healthcare system. This study also explored how racial and ethnic diversity within the nursing workforce may shape research engagement and contribute new perspectives to the field. Methods: A cross-sectional electronic survey was administered to registered nurses across 10 hospitals in a Northeast U.S. health system. The survey instrument assessed research attitudes, environment, involvement (past, present, future), and demographics. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including matched-pairs t-tests, were used to analyze responses. Results: Of 7655 invited nurses, 1094 responses were analyzed. Respondents were predominantly female (88.5%), White (56.8%), and employed full-time (87.1%) as clinical staff nurses (77.3%). While 54.8% had completed a formal research course (mainly within the past 1-3 years), informal research and statistics training were uncommon (17.4% and 5.4%, respectively). Nurses reported highly positive attitudes toward research (composite M = 2.15, SD = 0.51), especially its role in guiding practice, professional growth, and education. However, actual involvement was low. The most common current activities included practice change based on research (20.7%) and participation in committees (18.8%). Anticipated future engagement increased substantially, particularly in collaboration (+21.3%), committee participation (+20.6%), and IRB submission (+18.2%). The research environment was perceived as under-resourced, particularly in terms of protected time, funding, and mentorship. Statistically significant gaps were observed between perceived present and desired future supports (p < 0.01 for all 15 items). The Research Awareness Index revealed high rates of uncertainty about available resources (e.g., 66.1% did not know if internal funding existed). Conclusions: Nurses demonstrate strong positive attitudes and a desire to engage in research, including more advanced roles. Yet structural and informational barriers, particularly a lack of protected time, mentorship, and awareness of existing supports, limit participation. Investments in infrastructure, communication, and accessible development pathways are needed to translate nurses' readiness into active research engagement. Implications: Institutions should prioritize making research support more visible and navigable while investing in mentorship, protected time, and user-friendly infrastructure. Addressing both facets will empower a highly motivated nursing workforce to engage in and lead practice-relevant research.

Keywords: health services research; nurse clinicians; nursing administration research; nursing education research; nursing research; research engagement; translational research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Involvement in Research Activities.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Roadmap for Research Engagement.

References

    1. Funk S.G., Tornquist E.M., Champagne M.T. Barriers and facilitators of research utilization: An integrative review. Nurs. Clin. N. Am. 1995;30:395–407. doi: 10.1016/S0029-6465(22)00087-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rizzuto C., Bostrom J., Suter W.N., Chenitz W.C. Predictors of nurses’ involvement in research activities. West. J. Nurs. Res. 1994;16:193–204. doi: 10.1177/019394599401600206. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smirnoff M., Ramirez M., Kooplimae L., Gibney M., McEvoy M.D. Nurses’ attitudes toward nursing research at a metropolitan medical center. Appl. Nurs. Res. 2007;20:24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.11.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hagan J., Walden M. Development and evaluation of the barriers to nurses’ participation in research questionnaire. Clin. Nurs. Res. 2017;26:157–175. doi: 10.1177/1054773815609889. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Breimaier H.E., Halfens R.J., Lohrmann C. Nurses’ wishes, knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers on implementing research findings into practice among graduate nurses in Austria. J. Clin. Nurs. 2011;20:1744–1756. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03491.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources