Influence of lymphadenectomy extent on the efficacy of immunotherapy in recurrent gastric cancer patients
- PMID: 41004935
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110454
Influence of lymphadenectomy extent on the efficacy of immunotherapy in recurrent gastric cancer patients
Abstract
Background: Current guidelines recommend ≥16 lymph node (LN) dissection for gastric cancer, preferably >30. However, optimal LN count for immunotherapy after recurrence remains unclear.
Methods: Retrospective study of 147 gastric adenocarcinoma patients receiving immunotherapy for postoperative recurrence (2017-2023). Participants were grouped by dissected LN (DLN) count. Outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR).
Results: We collected data from 147 patients and stratified them into three groups by DLN count. Stratification revealed: Group A (DLN≤15, 6.1 %, n = 9), Group B (16-30, 44.2 %, n = 65), and Group C (>30, 49.7 %, n = 73). The median disease-free survival (DFS) post-initial surgery was 19.0 months. PFS under immunotherapy differed significantly: Group A (6.0 months) had worse outcomes than B (8.0 months), while C showed intermediate results (7.0 months; P = 0.017). OS followed a similar trend, with Group B having the longest median survival (18.0 months vs. 14.0 for A and 13.0 for C; P = 0.223). ORR was 34.0 %, with progressive disease (PD) more frequent in Group C (30.1 % vs. 20.0 % in B; P = 0.244). Multivariate analysis confirmed DLN count as the sole independent predictor of outcomes.
Conclusion: DLN count exhibits a U-shaped association with immunotherapy efficacy: both insufficient (≤15) and excessive (>30) dissection correlate with poorer PFS/OS versus moderate resection (16-30). Inadequate lymphadenectomy may cause stage migration, while excessive dissection could disrupt antitumor immunity. Precision lymphadenectomy balancing oncologic radicality and immune preservation is advocated.
Keywords: Dissected lymph node count; Gastric cancer; Immunotherapy; Lymphadenectomy; Recurrence.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources