Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Sep 18;15(18):2731.
doi: 10.3390/ani15182731.

Governance Perspectives on Genetically Modified Animals for Agriculture and Aquaculture: Challenges for the Assessment of Environmental Risks and Broader Societal Concerns

Affiliations
Review

Governance Perspectives on Genetically Modified Animals for Agriculture and Aquaculture: Challenges for the Assessment of Environmental Risks and Broader Societal Concerns

Marion Dolezel et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Biotechnological applications in animals are increasingly developed for use in agriculture and aquaculture to tackle breeding challenges in animal production. By examining two case studies of genetically modified (GM) farmed animals relevant to the European Union, slick-haired cattle and growth-enhanced carp, we highlight the challenges for environmental risk assessment and discuss available assessment approaches to address broader societal concerns. We find that the existing guidance for environmental risk assessment of GM animals available in the European Union faces several challenges. Assessing risks of GM animals in agriculture and aquaculture requires consideration of the farming systems of these animals. In addition, we find that there is a lack of guidance and practical implementation to address wider issues, including cultural, societal, ethical, and socio-economic issues, as well as animal health and welfare issues, related to GM farmed animals. We propose using existing assessment frameworks to address the sustainability of GM farmed animals beyond environmental risk assessment. Sustainability assessment approaches should also address potential farm-level sustainability claims of GM animal applications. We note that issues related to animal health and welfare are cross-disciplinary topics that require special attention when commercializing GM farmed animals. We recommend developing a comprehensive framework, including risk assessment, sustainability assessment, and technology assessment, that will enable policymakers to better anticipate and address the societal, legal, ethical, and governance issues associated with emerging biotechnologies in farmed animals.

Keywords: animal welfare; environmental risk assessment; genetic modification; genome editing; livestock; new genomic techniques; risk governance; sustainability assessment; technology assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Farming systems and protection goals for cattle [96,97,98,99,100] and common carp [79,101,102,103,104] in the European Union.

References

    1. Perisse I.V., Fan Z., Singina G.N., White K.L., Polejaeva I.A. Improvements in Gene Editing Technology Boost Its Applications in Livestock. Front. Genet. 2020;11:614688. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.614688. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tait-Burkard C., Doeschl-Wilson A., McGrew M.J., Archibald A.L., Sang H.M., Houston R.D., Whitelaw C.B., Watson M. Livestock 2.0—Genome editing for fitter, healthier, and more productive farmed animals. Genome Biol. 2018;19:204. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1583-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao J., Lai L., Ji W., Zhou Q. Genome editing in large animals: Current status and future prospects. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2019;6:402–420. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Menchaca A. Sustainable Food Production: The Contribution of Genome Editing in Livestock. Sustainability. 2021;13:6788. doi: 10.3390/su13126788. - DOI
    1. van Eenennaam A.L. Application of genome editing in farm animals: Cattle. Transgenic Res. 2019;28:93–100. doi: 10.1007/s11248-019-00141-6. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources