Defining Standard Data Reporting in Pelvic Exenterations for Non-Rectal Cancers: A Systematic Review of Current Data Reporting
- PMID: 41008892
- PMCID: PMC12468708
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers17183049
Defining Standard Data Reporting in Pelvic Exenterations for Non-Rectal Cancers: A Systematic Review of Current Data Reporting
Abstract
Introduction: Pelvic exenteration (PEx) was first described in the 1940s as a palliative procedure in managing cervical cancer. Since then, advancements in perioperative care have transformed the options available to patients. This highly morbid procedure now offers a "cure" in a select cohort of patients with locally advanced and recurrent pelvic cancers. The large volume of literature in this field has resulted in a heterogeneity of data reporting, making comparative analysis extremely difficult. As such, we set out to examine the current literature and identify currently reported outcomes to guide development of a core information set (CIS) for data reporting for PEx in non-rectal cancers.
Methods: A systematic review was carried out. Studies reporting on outcomes following PEx for advanced and recurrent gynecological, urological, and other non-rectal malignancies were included. Standardized outcomes were extracted and mapped to pre-determined domains.
Results: Forty-four studies were found to meet our inclusion criteria. A total of 1735 data elements (DEs) were extracted verbatim, and these were assimilated into 111 standard DEs across nine domains. A wide range of reporting frequencies was observed, with the pathological domain containing the highest overall frequencies of DE reporting. Conversely, patient-reported and functional outcomes were noted to be the domain with the lowest frequency.
Conclusions: This review highlights recent trends of increased reporting in the field of PEx and how this had invariably resulted in heterogeneous data reporting. We aim to guide the development of a CIS for reporting in non-rectal pelvic malignancies to help standardize future reporting.
Keywords: bladder cancer; cervical cancer; core outcome sets; locally advanced gynecological cancer; locally advanced pelvic malignancies; locally advanced urological cancer; locally recurrent gynecological cancer; locally recurrent pelvic cancer; locally recurrent urological malignancies; non-rectal cancer; outcomes; ovarian cancer; pelvic exenteration; prostate cancer; vaginal cancer; vulvar cancer.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Brunschwig A. Complete excision of pelvic viscera for advanced carcinoma.A one-stage abdominoperineal operation with end colostomy and bilateral ureteral implantation into the colon above the colostomy. Cancer. 1948;1:177–183. - PubMed
-
- Brown K., Solomon M., Koh C. Pelvic Exenteration Surgery: The Evolution of Radical Surgical Techniques for Advanced and Recurrent Pelvic Malignancy. Dis. Colon. Rectum. 2017;60:745–754. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
