Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 8;14(9):908.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14090908.

Co-Culturing Bacillus Strains for Enhanced Antimicrobial Activity

Affiliations

Co-Culturing Bacillus Strains for Enhanced Antimicrobial Activity

Charlie Tran et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Bacillus probiotic mixtures have been used as a novel source of antimicrobial production. However, there is a need to emphasize the potential of co-cultured Bacillus strains and to understand the underlying mechanisms involved in their combination formulation. Methods: Bacillus strains BPR-11, BPR-16, and BPR-17, were cultured either as mono or multi-cultures. The bacterial growth and density were evaluated by measuring their optical density. The chemical profiles of their bioactive extracts were analysed by LC-MS, and their antimicrobial activity were tested against selected pathogens. Results: Our results reveal that co-cultured strains significantly increased bacterial growth, with an optical density level of, 2.67 which was significantly higher than the monocultures of BPR-11 (2.24), BPR-16 (2.32), and BPR-17 (2.22). Furthermore, the ethyl acetate extracts from these bacterial cultures showed that the combined co-culture (F1) exhibited the highest antimicrobial activity, with MICs of 25 µg/mL against C. perfringens, E. coli, and S. aureus, and 50 µg/mL against P. aeruginosa and S. enterica. In contrast, the monocultures BPR-16 and BPR-17 showed moderate activity with MICs of 50 µg/mL against C. perfringens, E. coli, and S. aureus, and 100 µg/mL against P. aeruginosa and S. enterica. BPR-11 had the lowest antimicrobial activity, with MICs of 100 µg/mL against C. perfringens, E. coli, and S. aureus, and no activity against P. aeruginosa and S. enterica. Metabolite profiling showed that the extract from the co-culture had a marked increase in the production of antimicrobial metabolites, including C13-C16 surfactin C. Lastly, the metabolism study of surfactin C analogues suggested that they were highly stable (99%) when incubated with cytochromes P450 over 120 min. Conclusions: Together, these findings highlight the potential for multi-strain co-culturing to develop new antimicrobials and provide valuable insights into the synergistic effects for antimicrobial production.

Keywords: Bacillus; antimicrobials; co-culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author Xiaojing Chen was employed by the company Bioproton Pty Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fermentation OD600 over time with sigmoidal bacterial growth phases. The graph shows the optical density (OD) measurements over time for bacterial strains BPR-11, BPR-16, BPR-17, and F1. OD600 was monitored every 60 min for 8 h. Values represent the mean ± SD values of 3 replicates. Strain F1 exhibited the highest final OD600 followed by BPR-17, BPR-16 and BPR-11 respectively. The differences between F1 and individual monocultures were statistically significant. **** indicates p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
HPLC Chromatograms of EtOAc extracts of bacterial strains BPR-17, BPR-16, BPR-11, and F1. The peaks between 1–2 min were associated with the metabolites from the culture medium. Peaks at 4–5 min represent maculosin, maculosine 2, genistein and daidzein, while peaks at 6–7 min represent C13, C14, C15 and C16 surfactin C.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Standard concentration curve of pure C13, C14, C15 and C16 surfactin C by LC-MS. The measured R2 values measured were with C13 surfactin C (0.9906), C14 surfactin C (0.9994), C15 surfactin C (0.9984) and C16 surfactin C (0.9893). These R2 values were approximately 0.99, highlighting the linearity between the measured concentration and response.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Representative chromatograms displaying the production of C13 (A), C14 (B), C15 (C), and C16 (D) surfactin homologues produced by Bacillus strains BPR-11, BPR-16, BPR-17, and their multistrain-culture F1. These results are consistent across multiple analyses. The highest peak intensities were consistently observed in F1 throughout each spectrum, with lesser amounts detected for BPR-17 and BPR-16. BPR-11 consistently showed little to no detection of the surfactin homologues across repeated experiments.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Quantification of surfactin C analogues in co-culture and monocultures. The bar graph illustrates the quantification of C13-C16 surfactin C produced by the co-cultured Bacillus strain F1 and individual mono-cultured strains BPR-17, BPR-16, and BPR-11. The data reveals significant variations in surfactin C production among the strains, with F1 exhibiting the highest levels across all analogues, followed by BPR-17, BPR-16, and BPR-11.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Metabolic stability of C13-C16 surfactin C analogues in chicken liver microsomes over 120 min. Data points represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 3 independent replicates). The slowly decreasing lines indicate minimal degradation of the surfactin C analogues over the incubation period, suggestive of high metabolic stability within the gut. No statistically significant differences were observed between time points for any analogue (p > 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test). Quantification was performed using LC-MS/MS analysis, with results expressed as percentage of initial concentration remaining.

References

    1. Selegato D.M., Castro-Gamboa I. Enhancing chemical and biological diversity by co-cultivation. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14:1117559. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1117559. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kwoji I.D., Aiyegoro O.A., Okpeku M., Adeleke M.A. Multi-Strain Probiotics: Synergy among Isolates Enhances Biological Activities. Biology. 2021;10:322. doi: 10.3390/biology10040322. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kazemi S.A., Ahmadi H., Karimi Torshizi M.A. Evaluating two multistrain probiotics on growth performance, intestinal morphology, lipid oxidation and ileal microflora in chickens. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2019;103:1399–1407. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13124. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nicault M., Zaiter A., Dumarcay S., Chaimbault P., Gelhaye E., Leblond P., Bontemps C. Elicitation of Antimicrobial Active Compounds by Streptomyces-Fungus Co-Cultures. Microorganisms. 2021;9:178. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010178. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oana K., Shimizu K., Takada T., Makino H., Yamazaki M., Katto M., Ando M., Kurakawa T., Oishi K. Manipulating the growth environment through co-culture to enhance stress tolerance and viability of probiotic strains in the gastrointestinal tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2023;89:e0150223. doi: 10.1128/aem.01502-23. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources