Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 26;26(1):360.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09006-2.

Real-time 3D confirmation of complete ablation with margins as a local cure for colorectal liver metastases: the ACCLAIM trial

Affiliations

Real-time 3D confirmation of complete ablation with margins as a local cure for colorectal liver metastases: the ACCLAIM trial

Constantinos T Sofocleous et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Treatment failure and local tumor progression (LTP) after thermal ablation (TA) have been attributed to insufficient minimal margin (MM) ablation zone coverage of the target tumor.

Methods: This prospective, open-label, multicenter, international trial will enroll approximately 275 patients with one to three colorectal liver metastases (CLM) (for a total of 330 tumors) each up to 2.5 cm in largest diameter, eligible for local cure using microwave ablation (MWA). Any FDA cleared or CE-marked MWA device can be used. MWA will be performed with the intent to create a MM of at least 5 mm and ideally ≥ 10 mm. MM size will be documented intraprocedurally with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) immediately post-MWA and again within 4-8 weeks after MWA using any FDA cleared or CE-marked image-processing software to provide a 3D assessment of the ablation zone (AZ) and MM. An independent assessment of the MM by a central physician reviewer with expertise on AZ assessments will be conducted within 7 days of the MWA with 3D image-processing confirmation software and again within 7 days after the 4-8 weeks post-MWA CECT. A MM of 5.0 mm will represent the necessary condition for technical success of MWA. For MMs under 5 mm, repeat MWA will be performed within the same session whenever feasible/safe, and/or within 30 days from detection of the insufficient MM to create a sufficient MM (> 5 mm). MM size will be correlated with time to local tumor progression (TTLP). Local progression-free (LPFS) and hepatic disease-free survival (accounting for all tumors ablated) stratified by MM of 5.0-9.9 mm and ≥ 10.0 mm will be assessed with Kaplan-Meier and competing risk methodologies.

Discussion: This study aims to demonstrate that MWA of CLM ≤ 2.5 cm with 3D image-processing confirmation software of MM over 5 mm achieves definitive local tumor control. This will help establish margin confirmation as a new standard of care for MWA of CLM.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05265169. Registered on January 13, 2023.

Keywords: 3D assessment of the ablation zone; Colorectal liver metastases; Minimal ablative margin; Thermal ablation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interest

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) timeline. SOC, standard of care; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; QoL, quality of life. *Visits occur per standard of care every 3 months in the first year and every 6 months during the second year. For patients without local tumor progression for 2 years post-ablation, follow-up may be continued at approximately 1-year intervals, per SOC, until the trial ends. **Patients with technically unsuccessful ablation at the time of margin assessment (MM < 5.0 mm) may undergo repeat MWA at the discretion of the investigator

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, Ahnen DJ, Meester RGS, Barzi A, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(3):177–93. - PubMed
    1. House MG, Ito H, Gönen M, Fong Y, Allen PJ, DeMatteo RP, et al. Survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: trends in outcomes for 1,600 patients during two decades at a single institution. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(5):744–52, 52–5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Jong MC, Pulitano C, Ribero D, Strub J, Mentha G, Schulick RD, et al. Rates and patterns of recurrence following curative intent surgery for colorectal liver metastasis: an international multi-institutional analysis of 1669 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250(3):440–8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Creasy JM, Sadot E, Koerkamp BG, Chou JF, Gonen M, Kemeny NE, et al. Actual 10-year survival after hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases: what factors preclude cure? Surgery. 2018;163(6):1238–44. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nordlinger B, Guiguet M, Vaillant JC, Balladur P, Boudjema K, Bachellier P, Jaeck D. Surgical resection of colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver. A prognostic scoring system to improve case selection, based on 1568 patients. Association Francaise de Chirurgie. Cancer. 1996;77(7):1254–62. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data