Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Sep 26.
doi: 10.1002/pd.6898. Online ahead of print.

Prenatal Evaluation of Scrotal Masses: A Systematic Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Prenatal Evaluation of Scrotal Masses: A Systematic Literature Review

Federica Romanzi et al. Prenat Diagn. .

Abstract

Evaluation of fetal genitalia is often neglected after determining fetal sex, yet the identification of a scrotal mass may suggest significant underlying conditions requiring specific management. We conducted a systematic literature review, following PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024559035), on the five most common causes of prenatal scrotal masses: inguinoscrotal hernia (IH), meconium periorchitis (MPO), testicular solid tumors (TST), hydrocele (H), and testicular torsion (TT). A total of 83 cases were included (IH = 31; MPO = 23; TST = 6; H = 10; TT = 13), all diagnosed in the third trimester. IH typically presented as unilateral right-sided masses (63%), while MPO and H were predominantly bilateral (72% and 100%). TST and TT were mainly unilateral with no side preference. IH and MPO showed larger average diameters (> 35 mm). Additional findings were often associated with IH and MPO. MPO had the highest rates of preterm delivery (48%), neonatal medical support (40%), and urgent surgery (60.86%). IH and TST were usually associated with term deliveries and scheduled surgery (92.31% and 100%). TT showed a high incidence of urgent surgery (61.54%). This review outlines key sonographic features of prenatal scrotal masses to guide differential diagnosis and optimize perinatal care strategies.

Keywords: differential diagnosis; inguinoscrotal hernia; meconium periorchitis; prenatal diagnosis; scrotal masses; testicular torsion; testicular tumor; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. U. M. Reddy, A. Z. Abuhamad, D. Levine, and G. R. Saade, “Fetal Imaging,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 33, no. 5 (2014): 745–757, https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.33.5.745.
    1. Á. L. Soto, “[Genital Abnormalities: Contextualization of a Neglected Area in Prenatal Diagnosis],” Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia 71, no. 3 (2020): 275–285, https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3446.
    1. R. Achiron, O. Pinhas‐Hamiel, Y. Zalel, Z. Rotstein, and S. Lipitz, “Development of Fetal Male Gender: Prenatal Sonographic Measurement of the Scrotum and Evaluation of Testicular Descent,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 11, no. 4 (1998): 242–245, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469‐0705.1998.11040242.x.
    1. N. Zampieri, C. Zamboni, A. Ghidini, F. Borruto, and F. S. Camoglio, “Prenatal Sonographic Evaluation of Male Genitalia Development,” Minerva Ginecologica 60, no. 4 (2008): 317–321, PMID: 18560347.
    1. P. Sexton, J. T. Thomas, S. Petersen, et al., “Complete Penoscrotal Transposition: Case Report and Review of the Literature,” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 37, no. 1 (2015): 70–74, https://doi.org/10.1159/000358592.

LinkOut - more resources