Distinguishing Between Early Acute Gangrenous Appendicitis and Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis Using Ultrasonography: A Retrospective Observational Study
- PMID: 41013898
- DOI: 10.1002/jcu.70094
Distinguishing Between Early Acute Gangrenous Appendicitis and Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis Using Ultrasonography: A Retrospective Observational Study
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasonography in distinguishing early acute gangrenous appendicitis (AGA) from uncomplicated acute appendicitis (UAA).
Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital in Changsha Central Hospital, including 305 patients with AGA and 398 patients with UAA, confirmed through surgical and pathological examination. Univariate analyses of clinical and ultrasonographic data were followed by multivariate logistic regression modeling to identify significant risk factors for AGA.
Results: Univariate analysis revealed significant intergroup differences in sex, age, symptom duration, leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage, outer appendiceal diameter, peri-appendiceal mesentery thickness, appendicolith obstruction, intra-appendiceal fluid echogenicity, intra-appendiceal gas, appendiceal wall anomalies, and peri-appendiceal fluid. Multivariate analysis identified male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 1.788, p = 0.014), age ≥ 44 (OR = 2.174, p = 0.002), symptom duration ≥ 32 h (OR = 2.396, p < 0.001), neutrophils ≥ 84% (OR = 2.615, p < 0.001), peri-appendiceal mesentery thickness ≥ 7 mm (OR = 5.302, p < 0.001), intra-appendiceal fluid with poor ultrasound penetration (OR = 2.025, p = 0.004), appendicolith obstruction (OR = 2.030, p = 0.020), and appendiceal wall anomalies (OR = 16.772, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Ultrasonographic findings like appendiceal wall anomalies, intra-appendiceal gas, and peri-appendiceal fluid offer high specificity for diagnosing early AGA, while peri-appendiceal mesentery thickness ≥ 7 mm demonstrates high sensitivity. Combining ultrasound with clinical evaluation facilitates AGA diagnosis and informed treatment decisions.
Keywords: appendiceal wall anomalies; appendicitis; multivariate analysis; perforated appendicitis; peri‐appendiceal mesentery; ultrasonography.
© 2025 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
-
- Arthur, T., R. Gartrell, B. Manoharan, D. Parker, and QUEST Collaboration. 2017. “Emergency Appendicectomy in Australia: Findings From a Multicentre, Prospective Study.” ANZ Journal of Surgery 87: 656–660.
-
- Azok, J. T., D. H. Kim, A. Munoz Del Rio, et al. 2012. “Intraluminal Air Within an Obstructed Appendix: A CT Sign of Perforated or Necrotic Appendicitis.” Academic Radiology 19: 1175–1180.
-
- Bekiaridou, K., K. Kambouri, A. Giatromanolaki, et al. 2022. “The Prognostic Value of Ultrasound Findings in Preoperatively Distinguishing Between Uncomplicated and Complicated Types of Pediatric Acute Appendicitis Based on Correlation With Intraoperative and Histopathological Findings.” Diagnostics 12: 2315.
-
- Blumfield, E., D. Yang, and J. Grossman. 2017. “Scoring System for Differentiating Perforated and Non‐Perforated Pediatric Appendicitis.” Emergency Radiology 24: 547–554.
-
- Bom, W. J., J. C. G. Scheijmans, S. Ubels, et al. 2022. “Optimising Diagnostics to Discriminate Complicated From Uncomplicated Appendicitis: A Prospective Cohort Study Protocol.” BMJ Open 12: e054304.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous