Real-World Molecular Testing in European Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer
- PMID: 41014296
- DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70112
Real-World Molecular Testing in European Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: The global incidence and mortality of early-age onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC, or CRC diagnosed under 50 years) has increased in recent decades. High-risk surveillance and personalised oncological treatment may improve patients' outcomes. This study aims to characterise real-world somatic and germline molecular profiles in European EOCRC patients.
Patients and methods: Consecutive patients across the UK, Spain, Germany and Italy from the GEOCODE and SECOC consortia were identified using electronic patient records. Clinicopathological, somatic and germline testing data were collected on EOCRC patients. Tests included mismatch repair (MMR), somatic next generation sequencing (NGS) and germline multi-gene panels.
Results: Eight hundred ninety-three EOCRC patients were identified from 23 European centres (45.7% female, median age 42, range 14-49), predominantly in the distal colorectum: 205/893 (22.9%) patients with right-sided tumours, 302/893 (33.8%) left-sided tumours, 288/893 (32.2%) rectal tumours and 97/893 (10.8%) unknown. On somatic analysis, 735/893 (82.3%) of patients had pMMR tumours and 148/893 (16.5%) dMMR. Although 534/893 (59.7%) did not receive NGS somatic testing, somatic variants were detected in 233/359 (64.9%) of those tested. Germline variants were detected in 133/210 (63.3%) patients tested. Lynch syndrome was diagnosed in 93/210 (44.2%), of whom 17/93 (18.2%) presented with pMMR tumours. Systematic recording of family history in these real-world data was variable. In all patients with family history recorded, 153/484 (31.4%) patients reported a relative with CRC.
Conclusions: Our results support universal and paired somatic and germline multi-gene panels for all EOCRC patients, regardless of MMR status or family history. Systematic molecular testing approaches are necessary to address disparities in people with EOCRC. Larger unselected cohort studies would support validation of testing prediction models and estimates of clinically relevant variant actionability.
Keywords: colorectal cancer; early onset; germline; lynch syndrome; mismatch repair; real‐world data; somatic.
© 2025 The Author(s). United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.
References
-
- C. E. Bailey, C. Y. Hu, Y. N. You, et al., “Increasing Disparities in the Age‐Related Incidences of Colon and Rectal Cancers in the United States, 1975–2010,” JAMA Surgery 150, no. 1 (2015): 17, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1756.
-
- Surveillance Research Program. SEER*Explorer: An Interactive Website for SEER Cancer Statistics. [Internet]. Surveillance Research Program (National Cancer Institute, 2024), https://seer.cancer.gov/statistics‐network/explorer/..SEER.2024.
-
- S. Zhao, S. Wang, P. Pan, et al., “Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Gastroenterology 156, no. 6 (May 2019): 1661–1674, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.260.
-
- N. Akimoto, T. Ugai, R. Zhong, et al., “Rising Incidence of Early‐Onset Colorectal Cancer—A Call to Action,” Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 18, no. 4 (April 2021): 230–243, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571‐020‐00445‐1.
-
- I. O. Silla, D. Rueda, Y. Rodríguez, J. L. García, F. De La Cruz Vigo, and J. Perea, “Early‐Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Separate Subset of Colorectal Cancer,” World Journal of Gastroenterology 20, no. 46 (December 2014): 17288–17296, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17288.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
