Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 25:S0002-9165(25)00585-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.09.034. Online ahead of print.

Arm circumference as a marker of muscle mass: cutoff values from NHANES 1999-2006

Jarson P Costa-Pereira  1 , Carla M Prado  2 , Steven B Heymsfield  3 , Ana Pt Fayh  4 , Luiz Aa Menezes-Júnior  5 , Poliana C Cabral  1 , Alcides S Diniz  1 , M Cristina Gonzalez  6
Affiliations

Arm circumference as a marker of muscle mass: cutoff values from NHANES 1999-2006

Jarson P Costa-Pereira et al. Am J Clin Nutr. .

Abstract

Background: Although mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is a potential marker of skeletal muscle (SM), no study has proposed MUAC cutoff points using a large young reference population. Additionally, growing evidence highlights the impact of excess adiposity on anthropometric markers, which can mask their value in evaluating SM.

Objectives: This study aimed to propose cutoff points for MUAC as a marker of muscle mass, along with BMI-adjustment factors for individuals outside the normal BMI range (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), using data from the NHANES 1999-2006 sample.

Methods: Anthropometric and appendicular lean soft tissue (ALST; by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) data from the adult NHANES sample (aged ≥18 y) were divided into sex, age, ethnicity, and self-reported race subgroups. Adults aged 18-39 y with a BMI of 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 were used as the reference population, and MUAC cutoff points were derived at 1 and 2 SDs below the mean. Pearson's correlation (r) was used to assess the correlation between MUAC and ALST. Survey-weighted linear regression analysis was used to derive BMI-adjustment factors for MUAC.

Results: A total of 18,195 individuals were included (weighted proportion: 49.4% male; mean age: 43.9 y, 95% confidence interval: 43.4, 44.4 y). MUAC showed a strong positive correlation with ALST index (ALST/height2) (r = 0.83 for males, r = 0.79 for females). Rounded cutoff points for low MUAC were 28 cm (male) and 25 cm (female) and for very low MUAC were 26 cm (male) and 23 cm (female). Overall BMI-adjustment factors were: -3 cm (male), -2 cm (female) (BMI: 25-29.9 kg/m2); -7 cm (male), -6 cm (female) (BMI: 30-39.9 kg/m2); -10 cm (male), -9 cm (female) (BMI: ≥40 kg/m2).

Conclusions: This study proposes practical MUAC cutoff points, a potential marker of SM, along with BMI adjustment factors for individuals with excess weight, aiming to reduce errors in using MUAC for this purpose. Our results have the potential to enhance clinical routine assessments.

Keywords: anthropometry; arm circumference; body composition; cutoff; muscle mass.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest JPCP has previously received travel support from Fresenius Kabi as part of the Jumpstart Clinical Nutrition Program, travel costs from Danone Nutricia Brazil for a Speaker engagement, as well as speaking honoraria from Prodiet Medical Nutrition. CMP has previously received honoraria and/or paid consultancy from Abbott Nutrition, Nutricia, Nestlé Health Science, and Novo Nordisk; and investigator-initiated funding from Almased. APTF reports receiving a research grant from Prodiet Medical Nutrition. SBH serves on the medical advisory boards of Tanita Corporation, Novo Nordisk, Abbott, Novartis, Versanis, and Medifast. MCG has received honoraria and/or paid consultancy from Abbott Nutrition, Nutricia, and Nestlé Health Science Brazil. All other authors report no conflict of interest.

LinkOut - more resources