Comparative cardiovascular risk of sulfonylureas with low- and high-affinities for cardiac mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: A cohort study
- PMID: 41017568
- DOI: 10.1111/dom.70157
Comparative cardiovascular risk of sulfonylureas with low- and high-affinities for cardiac mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: A cohort study
Abstract
Aims: To individually evaluate the cardiovascular safety of low- and high-affinity cardiac mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium (mitoKATP) channel sulfonylureas by comparing each to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), a generally cardiovascular-neutral comparator, given prior evidence suggesting greater cardiovascular risk with high-affinity agents and the absence of a neutral active comparator.
Methods: A new user, active comparator cohort study using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting was conducted with Taiwan's nationwide claims database (2012-2022). Patients with recent pre-entry cardiovascular events were excluded. The primary outcome was 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death); secondary outcomes included each MACE component and all-cause mortality.
Results: The study cohort included 466 158, 83 031, and 473 539 new users of low-affinity mitoKATP-channel sulfonylureas (gliclazide, glimepiride), high-affinity sulfonylureas (glyburide, glipizide), and DPP-4i, respectively (mean age, 60.2 years; 55.6% male). Compared with DPP-4i, low-affinity sulfonylureas were not associated with increased risks of 3-point MACE (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.06), cardiovascular death (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93-1.08), or all-cause mortality (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93-1.01). Conversely, high-affinity sulfonylureas were associated with 1.17-1.31-fold increased risks of 3-point MACE, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality.
Conclusions: Initiating low-affinity mitoKATP-channel sulfonylureas demonstrated cardiovascular safety comparable to DPP-4i, whereas high-affinity sulfonylureas were linked to increased cardiovascular risk and all-cause mortality. These findings suggest low-affinity sulfonylureas are a safer alternative to high-affinity agents and as safe as DPP-4i. They may be appropriate for individuals with diabetes when newer therapies are inaccessible or unnecessary.
Keywords: cardiac mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate‐sensitive potassium channels; cohort study; dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors; major adverse cardiovascular events; sulfonylureas; type 2 diabetes mellitus.
© 2025 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- IDF Diabetes Atlas. 11th ed. International Diabetes Federation; 2025 Accessed May 10, 2025. https://diabetesatlas.org/
-
- Chow CK, Ramasundarahettige C, Hu W, et al. Availability and affordability of essential medicines for diabetes across high‐income, middle‐income, and low‐income countries: a prospective epidemiological study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(10):798‐808.
-
- Scheen AJ. Sulphonylureas in the management of type 2 diabetes: to be or not to be? Diabetes Epidemiol Manage. 2021;1:100002.
-
- Maladkar M, Patil S, Viswanathan H. Redefining the therapeutic wheel of diabetes management. J Cardiol Cardiovasc Ther. 2018;12(2):28‐34.
-
- Meinert CL, Knatterud GL, Prout TE, Klimt CR. A study of the effects of hypoglycemic agents on vascular complications in patients with adult‐onset diabetes. II. Mortality results. Diabetes. 1970;19:789‐830.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources