How urban impervious surface shapes bird foraging behavior in an arid city
- PMID: 41018905
- PMCID: PMC12466499
- DOI: 10.7717/peerj.19980
How urban impervious surface shapes bird foraging behavior in an arid city
Abstract
Wildlife behavior and interactions in urban ecosystems can vary across landscape types and species, with some birds dominating human-derived resources. This study investigates the relationship between urbanization, measured as impervious surface cover, and bird foraging behavior in the Phoenix metropolitan area in Arizona, USA. We conducted 126 feeding trials across 13 sites along a gradient of urbanization and bird interactions with anthropogenic food sources present. Trials were conducted using popcorn placed at random distances and orientations from a trash can. We recorded bird species visiting feeding stations and time to first visit during 20-minute trials and then quantified relationships among visitation timing (latency), species richness, and impervious surface coverage. Time to first visit was negatively correlated with the amount of impervious surface, with the highly urban areas having birds arrive at the feeding station the soonest. Great-tailed Grackles (Quiscalus mexicanus) comprised the most common visitor across all impervious surface levels. Non-native doves like Rock Pigeons (Columbia livia) and Eurasian Collared-doves (Streptopelia decaocto) were quicker to visit feeding stations compared to native doves like Mourning Doves (Zenaida macroura), Inca doves (Columbina inca), and White-winged Doves (Z. asiatica). Small urban-adapted generalists, like House Sparrows (Passer domesticus) and House Finches (Haemorhous mexicanus), tended to be more frequent visitors at highly urbanized sites compared to larger birds. These emphasize how species-specific foraging behaviors can differentiate resource use by birds in urban areas.
Keywords: Avian behavior; Coupled human and natural systems; Food waste; Foraging behavior; Human-wildlife interaction; Scavengers; Urban ecosystems.
©2025 Vega Rabelo et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare there are no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Anderson DR, Burnham KP. Avoiding pitfalls when using information-theoretic methods. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 2002;66(3):912–918. doi: 10.2307/3803155. - DOI
-
- Aronson MFJ, Lepczyk CA, Evans KL, Goddard MA, Lerman SB, MacIvor JS, Nilon CH, Vargo T. Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2017;15:189–196. doi: 10.1002/fee.1480. - DOI
-
- Blair RB. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications. 1996;6:506–519. doi: 10.2307/2269387. - DOI
-
- Brooks ME, Kristensen K, Van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, Skaug HJ, Maechler M, Bolker BM. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. The R Journal. 2017;9:378–400. doi: 10.32614/RJ-2017-066. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
