Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 12:12:1650337.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1650337. eCollection 2025.

Impact of skeletal muscle loss and sarcopenia on outcomes of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Affiliations

Impact of skeletal muscle loss and sarcopenia on outcomes of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Binwen Xu et al. Front Nutr. .

Abstract

Background: Sarcopenia is a systemic disorder characterized by the progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and function; however, its impact on the treatment outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer remains inconclusive. We aimed to evaluate the impact of sarcopenia and dynamic changes in skeletal muscle during treatment on neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) efficacy and prognosis in patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Methods: We retrospectively included 272 patients with locally advanced ESCC who received NICT. We calculated the skeletal muscle index (SMI) and its rate of change (ΔSMI%) from CT images at the L3 vertebral level obtained before and after treatment. Sarcopenia was defined as an SMI < 52.4 cm2/m2 in men and <38.5 cm2/m2 in women, and a ΔSMI% < -2.8% was designated as excessive skeletal muscle loss.

Results: The prevalence of sarcopenia increased from 50.9% before treatment to 55.1% at therapy completion. Pre-NICT sarcopenia correlated with tumor progression (p = 0.02) and was associated with a significantly lower pathological complete response (pCR) in patients who had sarcopenia than in those without (14.7% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.04). Patients with tumor progression had a significantly lower SMI than those in the disease-control group (41.6 ± 7.24 vs. 48.71 ± 8.39, p = 0.04). In a subgroup analysis of excessive skeletal muscle loss, these patients experienced higher hematologic toxicity (leukopenia: 33.4% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.04; anemia: 70.7% vs. 50.6%, p = 0.01) and lower pCR rate (12.0% vs. 22.8%, p = 0.05). After a median follow-up of 20.4 months, sarcopenia before or after NICT did not significantly affect overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) (p > 0.05). Conversely, excessive skeletal muscle loss during treatment emerged as an independent prognostic factor for OS in multivariate analysis (HR = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.91; p = 0.03); however, it was not associated with DFS (p = 0.22).

Conclusion: Treatment-induced excessive skeletal muscle loss may serve as a predictive marker for NICT toxicity and short-term survival in patients with locally advanced ESCC, highlighting the need for dynamic nutritional monitoring to optimize treatment tolerance.

Keywords: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy; overall survival; sarcopenia; skeletal muscle index.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Multivariate logistic-regression analysis of sarcopenia before and after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of OS (A) and DFS (B) between Pre-NICT sarcopenia and Pre-NICT non-sarcopenia; Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of OS (C) and DFS (D) between Post-NICT sarcopenia and Post-NICT non-sarcopenia.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Changes in skeletal muscle index of all patients before and after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. (B) The optimal cutoff value for OS determined using the Maxstat package in R software.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of OS (A) and DFS (B) between △SMI ≥ −2.8% and △SMI < −2.8%.

References

    1. Jiang W, Zhang B, Xu J, Xue L, Wang L. Current status and perspectives of esophageal cancer: a comprehensive review. Cancer Commun. (2025) 45:281–331. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12645, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sun J-M, Shen L, Shah MA, Enzinger P, Adenis A, Doi T, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet. (2021) 398:759–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01234-4, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li C, Zhao S, Zheng Y, Han Y, Chen X, Cheng Z, et al. Preoperative pembrolizumab combined with chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (PALACE-1). Eur J Cancer. (2021) 144:232–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.039, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kojima T, Shah MA, Muro K, Francois E, Adenis A, Hsu C-H, et al. Randomized phase III KEYNOTE-181 study of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. (2020) 38:4138–48. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01888, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen Y-X, Wang Z-X, Jin Y, Zhao Q, Liu Z-X, Zuo Z-X, et al. An immunogenic and oncogenic feature-based classification for chemotherapy plus PD-1 blockade in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell. (2023) 41:919–932.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.03.016, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources