A Model for Developing Subspecialty Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines 2.0
- PMID: 41019914
- PMCID: PMC12476112
- DOI: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100247
A Model for Developing Subspecialty Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines 2.0
Abstract
The original consensus-based Geriatric Emergency Department (GED) Guidelines, published in 2014, established a framework of core principles for delivering high-quality, age-appropriate emergency care for older adults. In response to significant advances in geriatric emergency medicine research and evolving clinical priorities, we developed the GED Guidelines 2.0 to ensure continued relevance, clinical utility, and evidence-based rigor. This concept paper describes the systematic and iterative process undertaken to update the guidelines, including the formation of multidisciplinary working groups and the application of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Unlike the original GED Guidelines, our approach prioritized methodological transparency, formalized evidence grading, and consensus building grounded in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We describe the identification, recruitment, and collaboration of multidisciplinary clinical and academic experts working together to improve the care of older adults in the emergency department. Through this multidisciplinary effort, key geriatric domains were selected, priority topics identified, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted to generate a robust evidence base for future guideline and policy development. The GED Guidelines 2.0 represents the first emergency medicine (EM) subspecialty guideline effort to fully adopt the GRADE framework, offering a novel blueprint for future EM guideline development.
Keywords: aged; emergency medicine; evidence-based medicine; geriatrics; health services for the aged; practice guidelines as topic; program development.
© 2025 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Satheesh Gunaga is a volunteer board member for Compassion and Choices, a non-profit organization. Satheesh Gunaga recieved funding as a site Sub-Investigator on an NIH-funded study (NIH Prime Award No. 1U19AG078105-01A1) during the conduct of this initiative. Christopher R. Carpenter was awarded grants from the National Institute on Aging (NIA) through R33AG058926 and R61AG069822, the John A. Hartford Foundation, and the West Health Institute. Christopher R. Carpenter held leadership positions with the Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) Network, the Clinician-Scientists in Transdisciplinary Aging Research (Clin-STAR) Coordinating Center, and the ACEP Geriatric Emergency Department Accreditation Advisory. Maura Kennedy received funding from the American College of Emergency Physicians and Gillian Reny Stepping Strong for Trauma Innovation, Brigham Health. Lauren T. Southerland was awarded grant from the NIA through K23AG061284. Rachel M. Skains was awarded grants from the NIA (R33AG058926) and the West Health Institute. Cameron J. Gettel was the pepper scholar with support from the Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center at Yale School of Medicine (P30AG021342) and the NIA (R03AG073988). Ula Hwang was awarded grants from the NIA (R33AG058926, R33AG069822), the John A. Hartford Foundation, and the West Health Institute. Shan Liu was awarded grants from Gillian Reny Stepping Strong for Trauma Innovation, Brigham Health; the John A. Hartford Foundation; and the West Health Institute.
Figures
References
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
