Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Sep 11:16:1672104.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1672104. eCollection 2025.

The importance of intonation for children's understanding of verbal irony

Affiliations
Review

The importance of intonation for children's understanding of verbal irony

Jordanna Smith et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Verbal irony refers to any utterance in which the speaker's words mean something different from their intended meaning (e.g., "You're really on top of things" said to a disorganized person). For children who are just learning to recognize verbal irony, a crucial cue to the ironist's intended meaning is their intonation. In this narrative review, we describe research methods for examining how intonation influences children's understanding of verbal irony and the task demands researchers need to consider when designing these studies. Next, we examine how children weigh different cues to verbal irony as they grow older, and we identify cross-linguistic factors that can impact children's use of intonation for irony comprehension. We offer suggestions for planning future studies on this topic by stressing the importance of reducing task demands, acoustically analyzing directional frequency changes, examining children's intonation consideration in languages other than English, and comparing across tonal and non-tonal languages.

Keywords: cognitive; cross-linguistic; linguistic; prosody; sarcasm; task demands.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Narrative review search strategy. Articles were excluded and deemed irrelevant if the abstract did not mention examining children’s attention to ironic intonation as a key variable of interest or if the paper was not published in English. Articles were also excluded if they did not describe an experiment.

References

    1. Ackerman B. P. (1983). Form and function in children's understanding of ironic utterances. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 35, 487–508. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(83)90023-1 - DOI
    1. Aguert M. (2021). Paraverbal expression of verbal irony: vocal cues matter and facial cues even more. J. Nonverb. Behav. 46, 45–70. doi: 10.1007/s10919-021-00385-z - DOI
    1. Aguert M., Laval V., Le Bigot L., Bernicot J. (2010). Understanding expressive speech acts: the role of prosody and situational context in French-speaking 5- to 9-year-olds. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 53, 1629–1641. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/08-0078), PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Averbeck J. M., Hample D. (2008). Ironic message production: how and why we produce ironic messages. Commun. Monogr. 75, 396–410. doi: 10.1080/03637750802512389 - DOI
    1. Banasik-Jemielniak N., Bokus B. (2019). Children’s comprehension of irony: studies on polish-speaking preschoolers. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 48, 1217–1240. doi: 10.1007/s10936-019-09654-x, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources