Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 1;34(3):133-138.
doi: 10.4103/ant.ANT-D-24-00047. Epub 2025 Sep 29.

Postirradiation Carotid Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Approaches, Endovascular Treatment, and Outcomes

Chia-Hung Wu  1   2 , Chung-Han Yang  1   2 , Kai-Wei Yu  1   2 , Wei-An Tai  1   2 , Fu-Sheng Hsueh  1   2 , Hsin-Wei Wu  1   2 , Chao-Bao Luo  1   2   3   4 , Te-Ming Lin  1   2 , Feng-Chi Chang  1   2   5
Affiliations
Review

Postirradiation Carotid Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Approaches, Endovascular Treatment, and Outcomes

Chia-Hung Wu et al. Acta Neurol Taiwan. .

Abstract

Postirradiation carotid stenosis (PIRCS) has emerged as a unique and challenging subtype of carotid stenosis (CS), which threatens patients with significantly worse outcomes even after aggressive intervention. Compared with nonirradiated CS patients, PIRCS patients face a shorter in-stent restenosis-free survival time after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting. This distinct behavior of PIRCS likely stems from radiation-induced endothelial changes, accelerated atherosclerosis, and potentially increased inflammatory responses. Furthermore, atypical lesions in the carotid arteries, which often occur in tandem and unusual locations, can complicate the diagnosis and treatment planning. Consequently, understanding the unique pathophysiology and clinical presentation of PIRCS is crucial for choosing optimal treatments and improving patient outcomes in this vulnerable population. In this review, we describe the basic features and unique characteristics of PIRCS. Some potentially novel treatment approaches are also discussed.

Keywords: Carotid stenosis; in-stent restenosis; percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting; postirradiation carotid stenosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Hsieh FI, Chiou HY. Stroke: Morbidity, risk factors, and care in Taiwan. J Stroke 2014;16:59–64.
    1. Houdart E, Mounayer C, Chapot R, Saint-Maurice JP, Merland JJ. Carotid stenting for radiation-induced stenoses: A report of 7 cases. Stroke 2001;32:118–21.
    1. Huang CC, Chiang HF, Hsieh CC, Lin HC, Wu CH, Lin TM, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of post-irradiated stenosis of subclavian artery: A matched case-control study. J Neuroradiol 2024;51:66–73.
    1. Huang CC, Chiang HF, Hsieh CC, Lin HC, Wu CH, Lin TM, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of post-irradiation stenosis of the vertebral artery. J Neuroradiol 2023;50:431–7.
    1. Huang CC, Jhou ZY, Huang WM, Chen JH, Chen CH, Huang CY, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of post-irradiated stenosis of subclavian artery. J Formos Med Assoc 2022;121:1102–10.

LinkOut - more resources