Estimation of Central Venous Pressure Using Cardiac Ultrasound of Inferior Vena Cava in Ventilated Children: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study, 2021-2023
- PMID: 41020643
- DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003834
Estimation of Central Venous Pressure Using Cardiac Ultrasound of Inferior Vena Cava in Ventilated Children: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study, 2021-2023
Abstract
Objectives: Despite its numerous limitations, especially in predicting fluid responsiveness, trends in central venous pressure (CVP) values may be useful for managing certain critically ill pediatric patients. Although ultrasound parameters of the inferior vena cava (IVC) cannot be used to estimate CVP in adults under mechanical ventilation (MV), the pediatric literature reports highly contradictory results.
Design: Prospective, multicenter observational study.
Setting: Six PICUs in France.
Patients: Children 2 days to 12 years old undergoing MV and had a central venous catheter in the superior vena cava to monitor CVP, from November 1, 2021, to June 30, 2023.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Ultrasound measurements (i.e., IVC maximum diameter [IVCdmax], IVC minimum diameter [IVCdmin]) were performed by experienced intensivists in order to calculate the following parameters: 1) IVC-Collapsibility: ([IVCdmax-IVCdmin]/IVCdmax) × 100; 2) IVC-Distensibility: ([IVCdmax-IVCdmin]/IVCdmin) × 100; and 3) IVC/Aortic: (IVCdmax/Ao) × 100. The search for correlation was studied using Spearman correlation tests because of monotonic relationships. We included 120 children with a median (interquartile range] age of 11.5 months (2.0-46.3 mo) and a median weight of 9.0 kg (5.0-15.0 kg). A third of the patients were admitted for postoperative care, including cardiac surgery, and a quarter for respiratory failure, with a median CVP of 7.5 mm Hg (5.0-10.3 mm Hg). No significant relationship was found between CVP and IVC-Collapsibility (Spearman ρ = -0.09; p = 0.32), IVC/Ao (Spearman ρ = 0.17; p = 0.06), or IVC-Distensibility (Spearman ρ = -0.09; p = 0.29).
Conclusions: There is no correlation between CVP and IVC-ultrasound parameters in children under MV.
Keywords: central venous catheter; central venous pressure; echocardiography; inferior vena cava; mechanical ventilation; pediatric intensive care unit.
Copyright © 2025 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Guilbert received support for article research from the National Institutes of Health. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Eskesen TG, Wetterslev M, Perner A: Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42:324–332
-
- Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al.: Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:691–699
-
- Pinsky M, Vincent JL, De Smet JM: Estimating left ventricular filling pressure during positive end-expiratory pressure in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 143:25–31
-
- Magder S: Central venous pressure: A useful but not so simple measurement. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:2224–2227
-
- Singh Y, Villaescusa JU, da Cruz EM, et al.: Recommendations for hemodynamic monitoring for critically ill children-expert consensus statement issued by the cardiovascular dynamics section of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC). Crit Care 2020; 24:620
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources