Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 30.
doi: 10.3340/jkns.2025.0109. Online ahead of print.

Prediction of Angle Loss after L4/5 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion : Development of a Risk Stratification Model

Affiliations
Free article

Prediction of Angle Loss after L4/5 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion : Development of a Risk Stratification Model

Se-Woon Kim et al. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. .
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of preoperative disc morphology and cage-related variables on disc angle change following single-level L4/5 oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), and to identify predictors of postoperative angle loss and angular subsidence.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 80 patients who underwent L4/5 OLIF with posterior percutaneous screw fixation and 1-year radiographic follow-up. Radiographic parameters included preoperative disc angle (DAPRE), sacral slope (SS), and cage position along the anteroposterior axis (Cage_Y). Postoperative disc angle loss was defined as a decrease in disc angle immediately after surgery. Angular subsidence was defined as a decrease in disc angle at follow-up compared to the postoperative period multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of these outcomes. Threshold values were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results: DAPRE >6.0°, SS <32.0°, and posterior cage placement (Cage_Y <1.9 mm) were independently associated with immediate angle loss. Among them, DAPRE showed the strongest predictive power (odds ratio, 7.9). Additionally, a greater initial angular gain was associated with a higher risk of angular subsidence. Based on these three parameters, a risk score (0-3 points) was generated, which showed a stepwise increase in the incidence of angle loss (0% to 81.3%) and subsidence over follow-up.

Conclusion: DAPRE, SS, and Cage_Y are key predictors of disc angle outcomes after OLIF. This model provides a simple, clinically applicable tool to predict alignment maintenance and optimize surgical planning in degenerative lumbar conditions.

Keywords: Lordosis; Lumbar region; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Oblique lumbar interbody fusion; Risk assessment; Spinal fusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources