Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Sep 29;15(1):33688.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-18768-3.

Comparative analysis of illumina and oxford nanopore sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA profiling of respiratory microbial communities

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative analysis of illumina and oxford nanopore sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA profiling of respiratory microbial communities

Guillem Macip et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The respiratory microbiome plays a crucial role in health and disease, necessitating accurate characterization through high-throughput sequencing technologies. This study provides a comparative analysis of Illumina NextSeq and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing platforms for 16 S rRNA profiling of respiratory microbial communities. Illumina sequencing, known for its high accuracy and short-read lengths (~ 300 bp), is widely used for genus-level microbial classification but struggles with species-level resolution due to its limited read length. In contrast, ONT generates full-length 16 S rRNA reads (~ 1,500 bp), enabling higher taxonomic resolution but historically exhibiting higher error rates (5-15%). Analysis of alpha and beta diversity indicated that Illumina captured greater species richness, while community evenness remained comparable between platforms. Beta diversity differences were significant in pig samples but not in human samples, suggesting that sequencing platform effects are more pronounced in complex microbiomes. Taxonomic profiling revealed that Illumina detected a broader range of taxa, while ONT exhibited improved resolution for dominant bacterial species. ANCOM-BC2 differential abundance analysis highlighted platform-specific biases, with ONT overrepresenting certain taxa (e.g., Enterococcus, Klebsiella) while underrepresenting others (e.g., Prevotella, Bacteroides). These findings emphasize that platform selection should align with study Objective: Illumina is ideal for broad microbial surveys, whereas ONT excels in species-level resolution and real-time applications. Future research should explore hybrid sequencing approaches to leverage the strengths of both technologies, thereby improving microbiome characterization in both clinical and preclinical settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Human ethics: This study involving human participants was approved by the Internal Review Board of Hospital Clinic, Barcelona (registry number HCB/2021/0343). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All methods involving human subjects were performed in accordance with the relevant institutional guidelines and regulations. Competing interests: A. Torres has received grants from MedImmune, Cubist, Bayer, Theravance and Polyphor, and personal fees as an advisory board member from Bayer, Roche, The Medicines CO and Curetis. He has received bureau fees for keynote speaker presentations from GSK, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca and Biotest Advisory Board, but these were not associated with the study described in this paper. All the remaining authors declare no conflict of interest. Animal ethics: Animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the European guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. The study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Barcelona (approval number 159/20). All animal procedures were performed in accordance with institutional and national regulations, and the study is reported in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Boxplots representing alpha diversity indices stratified by sequencing platform and sample group (Human or Pig). A) Boxplot of Shannon diversity. The mean diversity values for each group are 1.841, 1.504, 1.526, and 1.474, with a p-value of 0.4807, indicating no statistically significant differences between groups. B) Boxplot of observed OTUs. The mean observed OTU counts for each group are 93.40, 20.75, 100.04, and 64.29, with a p-value < 0.0001, suggesting statistically significant differences between groups.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) of beta diversity distances stratified by sequencing platform and sample group (Human or Pig). (A) Bray-Curtis distances: PERMANOVA results indicate no effect of the model (Df = 3, SumOfSqs = 8.060, R² = 0.327, F = 10.373, p = 0.001), with residual variation accounting for R² = 0.673. (B) Jaccard distances: PERMANOVA also shows no significant model effect (Df = 3, SumOfSqs = 8.060, R² = 0.327, F = 10.373, p = 0.001), with residual variation accounting for R² = 0.673. Both analyses were conducted using 999 permutations.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Stacked barplots displaying the five most abundant taxa in each sample, resolved to the genus level when possible, prioritizing the most specific taxonomic classification. (A) This graph represents Human samples collected from ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) patients, with a diverse range of pathogens identified as the causative agents of infection. The taxa composition reflects the microbial communities associated with this heterogeneous infection. (B) This graph represents an experimental VAP model in swine, inoculated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a common pathogen associated with VAP. The barplot highlights the microbial community dynamics in a controlled setting where P.aeruginosa is the primary pathogen.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Log-Fold Changes of Taxa Across Platform and Timepoints. Differential abundance of bacterial taxa is shown with log-fold change (LFC) values displayed along the y-axis for each taxon. The x-axis represents sequencing methods, with Illumina, and Nanopore at time points 12, 18, 24, and 72 h. LFC is represented using a color gradation, where yellow indicates enrichment and blue indicates depletion. A) This plot represents Human samples collected from ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) patients, with a diverse range of pathogens identified as the causative agents of infection. The taxa composition on the ANCOM-BC2 reflects the heterogenicity the human samples due to the lower number of taxa presents in the analysis. B) This plot represents an experimental VAP model in swine, inoculated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a common pathogen associated with VAP. The taxa composition on the ANCOM-BC2 reflects the similarity and standardization of the preclinical model microbiome.

References

    1. Cribbs, S. K. et al. Jan., ‘Correlation of the lung microbiota with metabolic profiles in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in HIV infection’, Microbiome, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–11, (2016). 10.1186/S40168-016-0147-4/TABLES/3 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnson, J. S. et al. ‘Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species and strain-level microbiome analysis’, Nature Communications vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Nov. 2019, (2019). 10.1038/s41467-019-13036-1 - PMC - PubMed
    1. López-Aladid, R. et al. Mar., ‘Determining the most accurate 16S rRNA hypervariable region for taxonomic identification from respiratory samples’, Scientific Reports 2023 13:1, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–10, (2023). 10.1038/s41598-023-30764-z - PMC - PubMed
    1. Earl, J. P. et al. Oct., ‘Species-level bacterial community profiling of the healthy sinonasal microbiome using Pacific Biosciences sequencing of full-length 16S rRNA genes 06 Biological Sciences 0604 Genetics 06 Biological Sciences 0605 Microbiology’, Microbiome, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–26, (2018). 10.1186/S40168-018-0569-2/METRICS - PMC - PubMed
    1. Louca, S., Doebeli, M. & Parfrey, L. W. ‘Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem’, Microbiome, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Feb. (2018). 10.1186/S40168-018-0420-9/FIGURES/4 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources