Editorial: Is REMS-BMD Truly a Measured Parameter? A Call for Transparency and Technical Clarification
- PMID: 41023454
- DOI: 10.1007/s00198-025-07699-4
Editorial: Is REMS-BMD Truly a Measured Parameter? A Call for Transparency and Technical Clarification
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: Author 1 (N Pocock) owns and provides a DXA service. Author 2, declares they have no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Casciaro S et al (2016) An advanced quantitative echosound methodology for femoral neck densitometry. Ultrasound Med Biol 42(6):1337–1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.01.024 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pisani P et al (2017) A quantitative ultrasound approach to estimate bone fragility: a first comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry. Measurement 101:243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.07.033 - DOI
-
- Di Paola M et al (2019) Radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry for osteoporosis diagnosis on lumbar spine and femoral neck. Osteoporos Int 30(2):391–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4686-3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Adami G et al (2020) Radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry for prediction of incident fractures: 5-year follow-up. Bone 134:115297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2020.115297 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pisani P et al (2023) Fragility Score: a REMS-based indicator for the prediction of incident fragility fractures at 5 years. Aging Clin Exp Res 35(4):763–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-023-02358-2 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous