Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 30.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.70110. Online ahead of print.

Perspectives of Nurses in the VA Coordinated Transitional Care (CTraC) Program: A Qualitative Study

Claire E Donnelly  1   2 , Nicholas A Rattray  1   2   3   4 , Mindy E Flanagan  1 , Jennifer L Myers  1   2 , Ashley L Schwartzkopf  1   2 , Caroline B Madrigal  1   5 , Cathy C Schubert  3   6 , Marianne Shaughnessy  7 , Jane A Driver  8   9   10 , Shivani K Jindal  7   11   12 , Dawn M Bravata  1   2   3   4
Affiliations

Perspectives of Nurses in the VA Coordinated Transitional Care (CTraC) Program: A Qualitative Study

Claire E Donnelly et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. .

Abstract

Background: The Coordinated Transitional Care (CTraC) program is an evidence-based, nurse-driven, low-cost intervention that improves transitional care for geriatric patients following hospital admission. CTraC reduces readmissions and enhances outcomes for older Veterans with chronic conditions or minimal caregiver support.

Objectives: This program evaluation was a component of the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Geriatric Learning Health System initiative, which seeks to support community-dwelling older Veterans as they transition from hospital to home. We examined CTraC's operation across diverse hospital settings and identified critical transitional processes and contextual factors supporting patients transitioning from hospital to home. Our goal was to identify lessons to support the widespread deployment of CTraC systemwide.

Design: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with CTraC nurses at 11 VA hospitals. Qualitative data explored program set-up, protocol use, data tracking, program challenges and successes, and readmission reduction strategies. Comparison matrices were developed within a rapid qualitative analysis approach.

Results: CTraC nurses act as the point person for Veterans, address concerns, provide guidance, and resolve potential issues before escalation. Five themes emerged on CTraC alleviating gaps in transitional care and the program's organizational factors impacting implementation and sustainment. Nurses identified and addressed problems, including medication issues, follow-up appointment scheduling, in-home safety issues, and handling tasks overlooked by other clinicians. Interviews indicated variation in CTraC nurses' ability to track data, integrate CTraC into existing systems, and communicate program effectiveness with leadership. Sustainability challenges (e.g., facility decommissioning CTraC due to limited leadership awareness of program effectiveness) highlighted the need for enhanced data infrastructure and analytic support to report program efficacy.

Conclusions: Adaptation and feedback-driven refinement are critical to expanding CTraC's impact and promoting sustainment. Strengthening data feedback support and workforce resources may enable CTraC to sustain its adaptive, patient-centered approach to transitional care for Veterans.

Keywords: interviews; nursing; quality improvement; rehospitalization; transitional care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. A. A. Vashi, J. P. Fox, B. G. Carr, et al., “Use of Hospital‐Based Acute Care Among Patients Recently Discharged From the Hospital,” Journal of the American Medical Association 309, no. 4 (2013): 364–371.
    1. S. V. Nuti, L. Qin, J. S. Rumsfeld, et al., “Association of Admission to Veterans Affairs Hospitals vs Non–Veterans Affairs Hospitals With Mortality and Readmission Rates Among Older Men Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, or Pneumonia,” Journal of the American Medical Association 315, no. 6 (2016): 582–592.
    1. L. E. Kazis, A. Lee, A. Spiro, et al., “Measurement Comparisons of the Medical Outcomes Study and Veterans SF‐36 Health Survey,” Health Care Financing Review 25, no. 4 (2004): 43–58.
    1. K. Carey and T. Stefos, “An Investigation Into the Cost of VA Hospital Readmissions. VA Office of Quality, Safety and Value,” 2014.
    1. M. K. Bailey, A. J. Weiss, M. L. Barrett, and H. J. Jiang, “Characteristics of 30‐Day All‐Cause Hospital Readmissions, 2010–2016,” 2019.

LinkOut - more resources