Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 30.
doi: 10.1111/dom.70167. Online ahead of print.

ForePass outperforms Semaglutide in weight control, glucose metabolism, and gut microbiota in swine

Affiliations

ForePass outperforms Semaglutide in weight control, glucose metabolism, and gut microbiota in swine

Sara Russo et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. .

Abstract

Aims: This study evaluated the metabolic efficacy of ForePass-a novel, incision-free, reversible, endoscopically delivered device that mimics biliopancreatic diversion-in growing pigs. The primary aim was the superiority of ForePass over Semaglutide in improving insulin sensitivity (SI). Secondary aims included effects on weight gain, endogenous glucose production (EGP), disposition index (DI), oral glucose rate of appearance, plasma metabolomics, and faecal microbiota.

Materials and methods: Over 30 days, 12 young Landrace pigs (46.7 ± 1.1 kg) received ForePass, twice-weekly Semaglutide, or sham endoscopy. Sample size was calculated a priori for the primary endpoint (Δ = 0.6 min-1·pM-1, SD = 0.3, α = 0.05, 80% power), yielding n = 4 per group. Body weight was monitored, and oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) with stable isotope tracers assessed hepatic glucose disposal. SI, insulin secretion, glucose rate of appearance (Ra), metabolomics, and faecal microbiota were analysed.

Results: ForePass improved SI more than Semaglutide (2.75 ± 0.37 vs. 1.34 ± 0.21 min-1·pM-1) and sham (0.78 ± 0.46; p <0.05). Weight gain was 2.0 kg (4%) with ForePass, versus 16.3 kg (36%) with Semaglutide and 21.1 kg (47%) with sham (p <0.0001). Semaglutide reduced weight gain by 11% versus sham (p <0.05). DI was 2.6-fold higher with ForePass than Semaglutide and 3.5-fold higher than sham. ForePass reduced oral glucose Ra by 40% versus Semaglutide and 30% versus sham, while EGP 46% was lower than Semaglutide and 51% lower than sham (p <0.0001). Metabolomics showed ForePass increased ketogenic and branched-chain amino acids, whereas Semaglutide raised lactate and alanine. Only ForePass increased faecal Akkermansia muciniphila.

Conclusions: ForePass produced superior insulin sensitivity and weight outcomes versus Semaglutide. Its distinct effects on glucose disposal, metabolomics, and microbiota support development as a reversible, incision-free endoscopic therapy that may bridge the gap between pharmacological and surgical options for obesity and type 2 diabetes.

Keywords: GLP‐1 analogue; animal pharmacology; antiobesity drug; obesity therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, et al. Once‐weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:989‐1002.
    1. Jastreboff AM, Aronne LJ, Ahmad NN, et al. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:205‐216.
    1. Mingrone G, Panunzi S, de Gaetano A, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1577‐1585.
    1. Mingrone G, Panunzi S, de Gaetano A, et al. Metabolic surgery versus conventional medical therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: 10‐year follow‐up of an open‐label, single‐centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;397:293‐304.
    1. Verrastro O, Panunzi S, Castagneto‐Gissey L, et al. Bariatric‐metabolic surgery versus lifestyle intervention plus best medical care in non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (BRAVES): a multicentre, open‐label, randomised trial. Lancet. 2023;401:1786‐1797.

LinkOut - more resources