Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Sep 30.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18336-z. Online ahead of print.

Use of Virtual Oncology in Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancers: A Scoping Review

Affiliations
Review

Use of Virtual Oncology in Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancers: A Scoping Review

Hima Bindu Thota et al. Ann Surg Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Telehealth has emerged as a promising solution to address access gaps in cancer care, particularly for complex conditions such as hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancers. Despite the broader adoption of telemedicine in oncology, HPB cancers remain underrepresented in digital health innovation. This scoping review aimed to characterize the extent, nature, and outcomes of telehealth interventions for HPB cancers.

Methods: From the inception of telehealth to 16 January 2025, a medical librarian searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases for studies on telehealth use in the HPB oncology patient population. Two reviewers screened studies in a dual-review process. The included studies examined telehealth for screening, treatment or surveillance, and reported feasibility, health outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and satisfaction in academic, community, or government health care settings.

Results: Of 5049 articles identified, 42 met the inclusion criteria. Most study designs were observational (cohort) or pilot feasibility trials focusing on patient-facing interventions such as mobile apps, symptom monitoring, and virtual consultations. Fewer studies evaluated provider-facing models such as virtual tumor boards or inter-institutional consultations. The most frequently assessed outcomes were feasibility (n = 28), health outcomes (n = 24), and satisfaction (n = 22), with minimal evaluation of cost-effectiveness (n = 3). Most of the studies were conducted in academic or urban settings, with only one study focusing on a rural population.

Conclusion: Telehealth for HPB cancers remains nascent, with interventions largely concentrated in high-resource, urban environments. Given the complexity of HPB care and the significant disparities in access, future efforts should prioritize the development of multidisciplinary, equity-oriented virtual platforms tailored to HPB populations.

Keywords: Digital health; Health equity; Hepatopancreatobiliary cancer; Telemedicine; Virtual tumor boards.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: There are no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Knudsen KE, Willman C, Winn R. Optimizing the use of telemedicine in oncology care: postpandemic opportunities. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:933–6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murphy A, Kirby A, Lawlor A, et al. Mitigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adult cancer patients through telehealth adoption: a systematic review. Sensors. 2022;22:3598. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Edge R, Meyers J, Tiernan G, et al. Cancer care disruption and reorganisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia: a patient, carer and healthcare worker perspective. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0257420. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Jensen RE, Brick R, Medel J, et al. National Cancer Institute–funded grants focused on synchronous telehealth cancer care delivery: a portfolio analysis. JNCI Monographs. 2024;2024:55–61. - DOI
    1. Shaffer KM, Turner KL, Siwik C, et al. Digital health and telehealth in cancer care: a scoping review of reviews. Lancet Digit Health. 2023;5:e316–27. - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources