Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Oct 1;8(10):e2534560.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.34560.

Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Plus Polymeric Micellar Paclitaxel and Survival in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Plus Polymeric Micellar Paclitaxel and Survival in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Hyehyun Jeong et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Limited prospective data exist on the role of adding taxane to standard chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers, especially in the Asian population, where biliary tract cancers are most prevalent.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of polyethoxylated castor oil-free polymeric micelle formulation of paclitaxel (hereafter, polymeric micellar paclitaxel), in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with untreated advanced biliary tract cancers.

Design, setting, and participants: This open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted across 7 centers in South Korea from September 1, 2019, to October 31, 2022. Patients were eligible if they had previously untreated, locally advanced unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the bile duct, were aged 19 to 79 years, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 to 2, and had measurable or evaluable lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumorsversion 1.1.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either polymeric micellar paclitaxel, 100 mg/m2; gemcitabine, 800 mg/m2; and cisplatin, 25 mg/m2; on days 1 and 8 or gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2, and cisplatin, 25 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. A total of 9 cycles were planned for both groups.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included investigator-assessed and blinded independent central review-assessed progression-free survival, objective response rate, and safety.

Results: A total of 150 patients (median [range] age, 65 [41-79] years; 87 [58%] male) were randomly assigned to the study (74 in the gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel group and 76 in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group). The study was prematurely terminated due to slow patient accrual. The median (IQR) follow-up duration was 10.4 (6.5-16.7) months. The median overall survival was 12.0 (95% CI, 9.9-15.8) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel group and 11.1 (95% CI, 9.7-13.5) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63-1.41; P = .76). Both blinded independent central review-assessed and investigator-assessed progression-free survival as well as the objective response rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. No unanticipated safety signals were observed.

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel did not improve survival compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin combined in patients with previously untreated advanced biliary tract cancer. This study provides further evidence regarding the limitations of intensified chemotherapy with the addition of taxanes in advanced biliary tract cancer.

Trial registration: cris.nih.go.kr identifier: KCT0003726.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr I. Park reported receiving grants from Amgen, Boryung, Chong Kun Dang, and Astellas, personal fees from Janssen, BMS, ONO, MSD, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Ipsen, Merck, Bayer, and Astellas outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Patient Flow Diagram
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Survival Outcomes.
BICR indicates blinded independent central review; HR, hazard ratio; PFS, progression-free survival.

References

    1. Bridgewater JA, Goodman KA, Kalyan A, Mulcahy MF. Biliary tract cancer: epidemiology, radiotherapy, and molecular profiling. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:e194-203. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_160831 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, et al. ; ABC-02 Trial Investigators . Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(14):1273-1281. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oh DY, Ruth He A, Qin S, et al. Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer. NEJM Evid. Published online June 1, 2022. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2200015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kelley RK, Ueno M, Yoo C, et al. ; KEYNOTE-966 Investigators . Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KEYNOTE-966): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023;401(10391):1853-1865. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00727-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Phelip JM, Desrame J, Edeline J, et al. ; PRODIGE 38 AMEBICA Investigators/Collaborators . Modified FOLFIRINOX versus CISGEM chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (PRODIGE 38 AMEBICA): a randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(3):262-271. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00679 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms