Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct 1;16(1):8632.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63546-4.

Polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes shows context-dependent effects across populations

Boya Guo  1 Yanwei Cai  2 Daeeun Kim  3   4 Roelof A J Smit  5 Zhe Wang  5   6 Kruthika R Iyer  7   8   9 Austin T Hilliard  9 Jeffrey Haessler  2 Ran Tao  10   11 K Alaine Broadaway  4 Yujie Wang  3 Nikita Pozdeyev  12 Frederik F Stæger  13 Chaojie Yang  14 Brett Vanderwerff  15 Amit D Patki  16 Lauren Stalbow  5 Meng Lin  12 Nicholas Rafaels  12 Jonathan Shortt  12 Laura Wiley  12 Maggie Stanislawski  12 Jack Pattee  17 Lea Davis  18 Peter S Straub  11   19 Megan M Shuey  11   19 Nancy J Cox  11   19 Nanette R Lee  20 Marit E Jørgensen  21   22 Peter Bjerregaard  22 Christina Larsen  22 Torben Hansen  23 Ida Moltke  13 James B Meigs  24 Daniel O Stram  25 Xianyong Yin  26   27   28 Xiang Zhou  27   28 Kyong-Mi Chang  29   30 Shoa L Clarke  8   9   31 Rodrigo Guarischi-Sousa  8   9 Joanna Lankester  8   9 Philip S Tsao  8   9 Steven Buyske  32 Mariaelisa Graff  3 Laura M Raffield  4 Quan Sun  33 Lynne R Wilkens  34 Christopher S Carlson  2 Charles B Easton  35   36 Simin Liu  37 JoAnn E Manson  24 Loïc L Marchand  34 Christopher A Haiman  25 Karen L Mohlke  4 Penny Gordon-Larsen  38 Anders Albrechtsen  13 Michael Boehnke  15 Stephen S Rich  14 Ani Manichaikul  14 Jerome I Rotter  39 Noha A Yousri  40   41 Ryan M Irvin  16 biobank at the Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine (CCPM)VA Million Veteran Program (MVP)Chris Gignoux  12 Kari E North  3 Ruth J F Loos  5 Themistocles L Assimes  8   9 Ulrike Peters  2   42 Charles Kooperberg  2 Sridharan Raghavan  12   43 Heather M Highland  3 Burcu F Darst  44
Collaborators, Affiliations

Polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes shows context-dependent effects across populations

Boya Guo et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Polygenic risk scores hold prognostic value for identifying individuals at higher risk of type 2 diabetes. However, further characterization is needed to understand the generalizability of type 2 diabetes polygenic risk scores in diverse populations across various contexts. We systematically characterize a multi-ancestry type 2 diabetes polygenic risk score among 244,637 cases and 637,891 controls across diverse populations from the Population Architecture Genomics and Epidemiology Study and 13 additional biobanks and cohorts. Polygenic risk score performance is context dependent, with better performance in those who are younger, male, without hypertension, and not obese or overweight. Additionally, the polygenic risk score is associated with various diabetes-related cardiometabolic traits and type 2 diabetes complications, suggesting its utility for stratifying risk of complications and identifying shared genetic architecture between type 2 diabetes and other diseases. These findings highlight the need to account for context when evaluating polygenic risk score as a tool for type 2 diabetes risk prognostication and the potentially generalizable associations of type 2 diabetes polygenic risk score with diabetes-related traits, despite differential performance in type 2 diabetes prediction across diverse populations. Our study provides a comprehensive resource to characterize a type 2 diabetes polygenic risk score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: R.J.F.L. has acted as a member of advisory boards and as a speaker for Ely Lilly and the Novo Nordisk Foundation, for which she has received fees. L.M.R. is a consultant for the NHLBI TOPMed Administrative Coordinating Center (through Westat). U.P. was a consultant with AbbVie, and her husband holds individual stocks for the following companies: BioNTech SE—ADR, Amazon, CureVac BV, Google/Alphabet Inc Class C, NVIDIA Corp, Microsoft Corp. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Workflow of T2D PRS construction and evaluation.
Four T2D PRS were constructed and evaluated in the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) study to identify the best-performing score for downstream analyses. The best-performing PRS across populations was used for stratified analyses across demographic, medical, and lifestyle and behavioral characteristics, and association analyses with diabetes-related traits in PAGE. Stratified and association analyses were replicated in 11 independent cohorts. Phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) were conducted across five independent biobanks to assess the broader clinical impact of the T2D PRS.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Performance of T2D PRS across self-identified populations.
A Area under the curve (AUC) for four T2D PRS methods in PAGE. PRS Methods 1–4 correspond to those in Fig. 1. Data are presented as AUC with 95% confidence interval (CI). B Association between each SD unit increase in the Ge et al. T2D PRS with T2D risk in PAGE and the additional biobanks and cohorts. Data are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI. Sample sizes for A and B are provided in Supplementary Data 1.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Distribution of age at T2D diagnosis by PRS decile and population in All of Us.
Data are presented as mean age at diagnosis with standard error. Sample sizes are provided in Supplementary Data 6.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Effect of the T2D PRS on T2D risk stratified by demographic, medical, and lifestyle and behavioral factors meta-analyzed across PAGE and the additional biobanks and cohorts.
Data are presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). P-values of heterogeneity from a two-sided Cochrane Q-test are indicated when differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). A Demographic characteristics and medical history factors. B Behavioral and lifestyle factors. C Medication use. D Lipids. Sample sizes for AD are provided in Supplementary Data 9.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Effect of T2D PRS on diabetes-related traits meta-analyzed across PAGE and the additional biobanks and cohorts.
The X-axis represents the beta estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of PRS for continuous traits and odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs of PRS for binary traits. P-values shown on each plot are exact values derived from two-sided linear regression models for continuous traits and two-sided logistic regression models for binary traits. Solid circles indicate significant associations that passed the Bonferroni-adjusted P-value threshold of P < 2.50 × 10−3, while open circles indicate associations that were not significant. Panels show associations for the T2D PRS and A glycemic traits in T2D controls and B cardiometabolic traits in T2D cases (left), controls (middle), and individuals with prediabetes (right). The units of continuous traits are listed in Supplementary Data 13. Sample sizes are provided in Supplementary Data 14. Results for vascular disease, kidney function related traits, and inflammatory biomarkers are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. T2D PRS PheWAS results meta-analyzed across all five biobanks and populations.
The X-axis represents phecodes color-coded by their corresponding phenotype category and is ordered by the category with the most to the category with the least significant hits. The Y-axis represents the −log10(p-value) derived from two-sided logistic regression models. The red horizontal line represents Bonferroni-adjusted p-value threshold P < 2.75 × 10−5 (732 phecodes meet this threshold), and the blue horizontal line represents an unadjusted p-value threshold of P < 0.05 (1120 phecodes meet this threshold). Upward triangles indicate positive associations, while downward triangles indicate negative associations. The top ten most significant associations from the endocrine/metabolic category are annotated, with the single most significant association shown in black and others shown in gray, while the single most significant association from each other category is annotated.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Comparison of significant associations and effect sizes of T2D PRS PheWAS results by population.
A Venn diagram of significant PheWAS results across populations. B Comparison of odds ratios from T2D PRS PheWAS results across populations.

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Atlas 2021 10th edn (International Diabetes Federation, 2021).
    1. Bommer, C. et al. Global economic burden of diabetes in adults: projections from 2015 to 2030. Diabetes Care41, 963–970 (2018). - PubMed
    1. Khera, A. V. et al. Genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases identify individuals with risk equivalent to monogenic mutations. Nat. Genet.50, 1219–1224 (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frieser, M. J., Wilson, S. & Vrieze, S. I. Behavioral impact of return of genetic test results for complex disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol.37, 1134–1144 (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Natarajan, P. et al. Polygenic risk score identifies subgroup with higher burden of atherosclerosis and greater relative benefit from statin therapy in the primary prevention setting. Circulation135, 2091–2101 (2017). - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources