Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct 1;25(1):1275.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13478-y.

Efficiency and productivity of county-level CDCs in Qingdao municipal, China: a retrospective study based on 6 years of panel data

Affiliations
Free article

Efficiency and productivity of county-level CDCs in Qingdao municipal, China: a retrospective study based on 6 years of panel data

Chongyi Wang et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: County-level Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCs) are the foundational units of China's public health system. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the shortcomings of the system, making it urgent to strengthen the functions of county-level CDCs. The efficiency and equity of resource allocation are crucial for enhancing public health outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate six-year trends (2018-2023) in equity and efficiency of resource allocation among the ten county-level CDCs in Qingdao and to identify actionable measures for optimizing grassroots public-health capacity in the post-COVID-19 era.

Methods: We used Gini coefficient and Lorenz curve to assess the equity of resource allocation in the county-level CDCs in Qingdao. The efficiency of CDCs was evaluated using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and Bootstrap DEA. Efficiency change was analyzed by employing the Malmquist productivity index (MPI).

Results: The health resources at the Qingdao CDCs showed an overall upward trend from 2018 to 2023. During 2018-2023, CDC personnel allocation showed good equity in demographic and economic dimensions (Gini < 0.3), but suboptimal equity in geographic distribution (Gini 0.3-0.5). The average technical efficiency was 0.940, pure technical efficiency averaged 0.995, and scale efficiency was 0.944. Among 10 CDCs, 50% achieved DEA efficiency. According to the total factor productivity (TFP) reflected by the indicator system constructed in this study, TFP grew at a rate of 6.0% between 2022 and 2023. Changes in technical efficiency change (TEC) and scale efficiency change (SEC) generally exceeded those in technological progress (TC).

Conclusion: In order to enhance the equity and efficiency of resource allocation in county-level CDCs in Qingdao City. The government needs to adopt targeted policies, such as implementing flexible staffing adjustments, increasing the number of technical personnel and senior experts, and strengthening continuous training to enhance workforce capabilities. Also, fiscal efficiency should be enhanced by linking fund allocation with performance evaluation. Meanwhile, accelerating technological modernization and enhancing technological capabilities through digital tools and management innovation are crucial. Overall, these comprehensive measures aim to enhance resource utilization efficiency and strengthen the resilience of public health services.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Keywords: County-level centers for disease control and prevention; Data envelopment analysis; Efficiency; Gini coefficient and Lorenz curve.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was performed in line with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. And this study utilized anonymized administrative data routinely collected by Qingdao CDC branches for operational reporting purposes. No individual-level human data, biological samples, or personal identifiers were involved. According to China’s “Ethical Review Measures for Biomedical Research Involving Humans” (National Health Commission, 2016), analyses of aggregated institutional performance data without personal identifiers are exempt from ethics committee review. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. State Council Information Office. General Office of the State Council Issues Guiding Opinions on Promoting High-Quality Development of Disease Prevention and Control. Health Econ Res. 2024;41(3):14. https://doi.org/10.14055/j.cnki.33-1056/f.2024.03.010 . - DOI
    1. Ministry of Health Notice on the Issuance of Core Functions of Disease Prevention and Control Institutions at All Levels and Performance Evaluation Standards for Disease Prevention and Control Work. (Weiji Kongfa [2008] No. 68). Gazette of the ministry of health of the people’s Republic of China 2009;2:59.
    1. Liu F, Guo Q, Cui R, Jiao L, Wang J. Practice and discussion on the reconstruction of the microbiology laboratory of Grass-root CDC. Sci Technol Inform. 2022;20(2):223–5. https://doi.org/10.16661/j.cnki.1672-3791.2112-5042-1299 . - DOI
    1. Zhou M. Equity and efficiency of health resource allocation in Sichuan province, China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24(1):1439. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11946-5 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Zhan W, Zhu M, Zhang L. Equity and efficiency of health resource allocation in Township health centers in Guizhou Province. Chin Rural Health Service Adm. 2025;45(2):96–102. https://doi.org/10.19955/j.cnki.1005-5916.2025.02.004 . - DOI

LinkOut - more resources