Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct 2.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03652-w. Online ahead of print.

Congenital complex uterine anomalies carry complex complications: an evaluation of ART outcomes

Affiliations

Congenital complex uterine anomalies carry complex complications: an evaluation of ART outcomes

Keizra Mecklai et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. .

Abstract

Purpose: To examine assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes in patients with congenital complex uterine anomalies (CUA) as well as the impact of surgical repair on these outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 46 patients with CUA who underwent 130 embryo transfer cycles at a large academic fertility center from 2000 to 2024. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent surgical repair and those who did not.

Results: The overall live birth and ongoing pregnancy rate after fresh or frozen embryo transfer was 36.9% (48/130). Cesarean section was the most common mode of delivery (61.7%). Pregnancy complications occurred in 38.3% of live births. Live birth and ongoing pregnancy rates did not differ significantly between patients with and without surgical repair (32.6% vs. 39.2%, p = 0.57).

Conclusions: Patients with complex uterine anomalies experience lower live birth rates compared to the center's average and face a high risk of pregnancy complications. Surgical repair of CUA does not significantly improve ART outcomes. Personalized counseling regarding goals and risks is crucial for CUA patients undergoing ART.

Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology; Bicornuate; Complex uterine anomalies; Didelphys; Embryo transfer; Müllerian anomalies; Reproductive surgery; Septum; Unicornuate; Uterine factor infertility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval: Performed with NYU IRB approval #13–00389. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Pfeifer SM, Attaran M, Goldstein J, et al. ASRM müllerian anomalies classification 2021. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(5):1238–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.09.025 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lin PC, Bhatnagar KP, Nettleton GS, Nakajima ST. Female genital anomalies affecting reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(5):899–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03368-x . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buttram VC, Gibbons WE. Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification. (An analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril. 1979;32(1):40–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)44114-2 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions. distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988;49(6):944–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59942-7 . - DOI
    1. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(6):761. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr028 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources