Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct 3.
doi: 10.1111/epi.18658. Online ahead of print.

Hippocampal abnormality and response to vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy

Affiliations

Hippocampal abnormality and response to vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy

Harry J Clifford et al. Epilepsia. .

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) reduces seizure frequency and severity in some, but not all, individuals with epilepsy. The hippocampus has been implicated in VNS response, but is yet to be studied structurally using T1-weighted (T1w) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this study we hypothesized greater hippocampal abnormality in VNS non-responders. Using hippocampal morphometrics, we extracted the volumes of four hippocampal regions from T1w MRI across three groups; VNS responders ( n = 42 $$ n=42 $$ ), non-responders ( n = 50 $$ n=50 $$ ), and healthy controls ( n = 100 $$ n=100 $$ ). We first calculated the multivariate Mahalanobis distance using z-scores from all four hippocampal regions to measure abnormality relative to controls. We then compared traditional univariate measures to the Mahalanobis distance. Response to VNS was defined as having a 50 % $$ \ge 50\% $$ seizure reduction 2 years post-implantation. Hippocampal morphometrics were significantly more abnormal in non-responders than responders ( p = .005 , biserial r = .32 $$ p=.005,\mathrm{biserial}\ r=.32 $$ ) using the multivariate Mahalanobis distance. Univariate approaches did not differ significantly between responders and non-responders ( p > .05 $$ p>.05 $$ ). At the group level, non-responders to VNS had greater structural hippocampal abnormality when using the multivariate approach. Conversely, this effect was lost with the univariate analysis. This suggests that abnormality is likely present in different parts of the hippocampus in different individuals. Future studies should incorporate multivariate, and potentially multi-modal, information to better characterize the mechanisms of VNS response.

Keywords: MRI; biomarker; prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Englot DJ, Chang EF, Auguste KI. Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy by patient age, epilepsy duration, and seizure type. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2011;22(4):443–448.
    1. Elliott RE, Morsi A, Kalhorn SP, Marcus J, Sellin J, Kang M, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation in 436 consecutive patients with treatment‐resistant epilepsy: long‐term outcomes and predictors of response. Epilepsy Behav. 2011;20(1):57–63.
    1. Toffa DH, Touma L, El Meskine T, Bouthillier A, Nguyen DK. Learnings from 30 years of reported efficacy and safety of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for epilepsy treatment: a critical review. Seizure. 2020;83:104–123.
    1. Clifford HJ. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for epilepsy – a narrative review of factors predictive of response. Epilepsia. 2024; 65 (12):3441–3456 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/epi.18153.
    1. Workewych AM, Arski ON, Mithani K, Ibrahim GM. Biomarkers of seizure response to vagus nerve stimulation: a scoping review. Epilepsia. 2020;61(10):2069–2085.

LinkOut - more resources