Non-Clozapine interventions in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 41044402
- DOI: 10.1038/s41380-025-03255-y
Non-Clozapine interventions in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background and hypothesis: Clozapine is the only licensed pharmacotherapy for treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS), but in some cases is not a suitable treatment option. A review of the efficacy of non-clozapine interventions in TRS may help inform clinical decision making when clozapine treatment is not feasible.
Study design: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed investigating the efficacy of non-clozapine augmentation of antipsychotic treatment in TRS on positive, negative, and total symptoms. The review protocol is registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023418053). PsycInfo, PubMed and EMBASE were searched up until July 2023. Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (v2) was used to assess study quality. Data were pooled using a random-effects model for each class of intervention to give an estimate of effect size (Hedges' g).
Results: 78 studies were included, of which 68 were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 3241 patients. High-dose antipsychotics (7 studies, 467 participants) did not improve any symptom domain. Augmentation of antipsychotics with glycine modulatory site agonists (9 studies, 187 participants) improved positive (g = -0.56 [-0.81, -0.31], GRADE rating Low), negative (g = -1.18 [-1.49, -0.87], GRADE rating Low) and total (g = -1.17 [-1.75, -0.59], GRADE rating Very Low) symptoms. Non-invasive stimulation (26 studies, 893 participants) moderately benefited positive symptoms (g = -0.42 [-0.65, -0.18], GRADE rating Low). Psychotherapy (10 studies, 565 participants) moderately improved positive symptoms (g = -0.56 [-1.01, -0.10], GRADE rating Low). Augmentation with antidepressants (3 studies, 187 participants) improved negative (g = -0.74 [-1.46, -0.02], GRADE rating Very Low) and total (g = -0.69 [-1.00, -0.38], GRADE rating Low) symptoms. Sample sizes were small, and publication bias was apparent for non-invasive stimulation studies.
Conclusions: Several augmentation strategies, including pharmacotherapy, non-invasive stimulation, and psychotherapy demonstrated benefit in small studies, however no intervention reached the threshold of evidence to be routinely recommended as a viable alternative to clozapine. High-quality trials are needed for definitive recommendations.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: RAM has received speaker/consultancy fees from Karuna, Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim and Otsuka, and co-directs a company that designs digital resources to support treatment of mental illness. TP has participated in educational speaker meetings organized by Lundbeck, Otsuka, Sunovion, Janssen, Schwabe Pharma, ROVI Biotech and Recordati, and co-directs a company that designs digital resources to support treatment of mental illness.
References
-
- Elkis H, Buckley PF. Treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Psychiatr. Clin. 2016;39:239–65.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
