Classification of major depressive disorder using vertex-wise brain sulcal depth, curvature, and thickness with a deep and a shallow learning model
- PMID: 41044403
- DOI: 10.1038/s41380-025-03273-w
Classification of major depressive disorder using vertex-wise brain sulcal depth, curvature, and thickness with a deep and a shallow learning model
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a complex psychiatric disorder that affects the lives of hundreds of millions of individuals around the globe. Even today, researchers debate if morphological alterations in the brain are linked to MDD, likely due to the heterogeneity of this disorder. The application of deep learning tools to neuroimaging data, capable of capturing complex non-linear patterns, has the potential to provide diagnostic and predictive biomarkers for MDD. However, previous attempts to demarcate MDD patients and healthy controls (HC) based on segmented cortical features via linear machine learning approaches have reported low accuracies. In this study, we used globally representative data from the ENIGMA-MDD working group containing 7012 participants from 31 sites (N = 2772 MDD and N = 4240 HC), which allows a comprehensive analysis with generalizable results. Based on the hypothesis that integration of vertex-wise cortical features can improve classification performance, we evaluated the classification of a DenseNet and a Support Vector Machine (SVM), with the expectation that the former would outperform the latter. As we analyzed a multi-site sample, we additionally applied the ComBat harmonization tool to remove potential nuisance effects of site. We found that both classifiers exhibited close to chance performance (balanced accuracy DenseNet: 51%; SVM: 53%), when estimated on unseen sites. Slightly higher classification performance (balanced accuracy DenseNet: 58%; SVM: 55%) was found when the cross-validation folds contained subjects from all sites, indicating site effect. In conclusion, the integration of vertex-wise morphometric features and the use of the non-linear classifier did not lead to the differentiability between MDD and HC. Our results support the notion that MDD classification on this combination of features and classifiers is unfeasible. Future studies are needed to determine whether more sophisticated integration of information from other MRI modalities such as fMRI and DWI will lead to a higher performance in this diagnostic task.
© 2025. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: PMT and NJ received a research grant from Biogen, Inc. for research unrelated to this manuscript. HJG has received travel grants and speakers’ honoraria from Fresenius Medical Care, Neuraxpharm, Servier and Janssen Cilag as well as research funding from Fresenius Medical Care unrelated to this manuscript. JCS has served as a consultant for Pfizer, Sunovion, Sanofi, Johnson & Johnson, Livanova, and Boehringer Ingelheim. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Germany. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Germany. In accordance with the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki, all methods in the participating cohorts were approved by the respective institutional review boards and local ethics committees, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. For participants under 18 years of age, written informed consent was additionally provided by a parent and/or legal guardian.
Update of
-
Classification of Major Depressive Disorder Using Vertex-Wise Brain Sulcal Depth, Curvature, and Thickness with a Deep and a Shallow Learning Model.ArXiv [Preprint]. 2025 Jan 24:arXiv:2311.11046v2. ArXiv. 2025. Update in: Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Oct 3. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-03273-w. PMID: 39975425 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
References
-
- Friedrich MJ. Depression is the leading cause of disability around the world. JAMA. 2017;317:1517 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.3826 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Machado M, Iskedjian M, Ruiz I, Einarson TR. Remission, dropouts, and adverse drug reaction rates in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of head-to-head trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22:1825–37. https://doi.org/10.1185/030079906X132415 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Stewart JW, Warden D, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1905–17. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Coffey CE, Wilkinson WE, Weiner RD, Parashos IA, Djang WT, Webb MC, et al. Quantitative cerebral anatomy in depression: a controlled magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50:7–16. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820130009002 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
