Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov-Dec;15(6):1534-1538.
doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.09.010. Epub 2025 Sep 22.

Artificial intelligence in dental age estimation- applications, technological advances and legal aspects: A narrative review

Abhinav Chopra  1 , Anand Gupta  1 , Naveen Aggarwal  2
Affiliations

Artificial intelligence in dental age estimation- applications, technological advances and legal aspects: A narrative review

Abhinav Chopra et al. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Dental age estimation constitutes a cornerstone in forensic odontology, pediatric dentistry, and medico-legal investigations. Traditional radiographic methods such as those by Demirjian, Willems, and Cameriere, though widely validated, are limited by examiner subjectivity, population-specific calibration, and low scalability. This narrative review examines the current landscape of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven dental age estimation, with a focus on deep learning technologies, comparative advantages over conventional methodologies, and applicability across clinical, forensic, and legal domains.

Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify original studies and systematic reviews that employed machine learning (ML) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for dental age estimation using panoramic radiographs or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Emphasis was placed on studies reporting model architecture, mean absolute error (MAE), classification accuracy, and external validation.

Results: AI-based models, particularly CNNs, demonstrated superior diagnostic performance with MAEs ranging from 0.03 to 0.7 years and classification accuracies exceeding 90 % at critical legal thresholds. These systems provide automated tooth detection, segmentation, and staging, with outputs that are rapid, objective, and reproducible. Nonetheless, critical limitations persist, including algorithmic opacity, demographic bias due to non-representative training datasets, and absence of international validation standards.

Conclusion: AI technologies represent a paradigm shift in dental age estimation, offering enhanced precision and operational efficiency. To facilitate clinical translation and forensic admissibility, future efforts must prioritize population-diverse training datasets, transparent algorithmic design, and consensus-driven regulatory frameworks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Image 1
Graphical abstract
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Schmeling A., Olze A., Reisinger W., Geserick G. Forensic age estimation. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2004;101(39):A2524–A2529.
    1. Thevissen P.W., Kvaal S.I., Willems G. Ethics in age estimation of unaccompanied minors. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2012;30(Suppl 1):85–102. - PubMed
    1. Ritz-Timme S., Cattaneo C., Collins M.J., et al. Age estimation: the state of the art in relation to the specific demands of forensic practice. Int J Leg Med. 2000;113(3):129–136. - PubMed
    1. Demirjian A., Goldstein H., Tanner J.M. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973;45(2):211–227. - PubMed
    1. Willems G., Van Olmen A., Spiessens B., Carels C. Dental age estimation in Belgian children: Demirjian's technique revisited. J Forensic Sci. 2001;46(4):893–895. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources