Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Oct 6;25(1):1357.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07741-3.

Efficacy of problem-based learning combined with case-based learning versus lecture-based learning in orthopedic education: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of problem-based learning combined with case-based learning versus lecture-based learning in orthopedic education: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xianghua Xiong et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of the Problem-based learning (PBL) combined with Case-based learning (CBL) teaching method compared with the Lecture-based learning (LBL) method in orthopedic education and provide evidence for optimizing orthopedic teaching methods.

Methods: Literature was systematically searched in Chinese and English databases and screened using strict inclusion/exclusion criteria. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the literature. Meta-analyses were performed with RevMan 5.3 and Stata 16 software. We compared the application effects of the PBL-CBL teaching method versus the LBL teaching method in orthopedic education across multiple dimensions: theoretical knowledge mastery, practical skill proficiency, comprehensive competency development, and satisfaction with teaching methods.

Results: (1) 15 studies involving 980 participants were included. (2) Meta-analysis showed significant superiority of PBL-CBL over LBL in: ①Objective outcomes: theoretical knowledge (SMD = 1.46, P < 0.0001), practical skills (SMD = 1.53, P < 0.0001), physical examination (SMD = 1.64, P < 0.0001), case analysis (SMD = 1.30, P < 0.0001), and plaster immobilization (SMD = 2.42, P < 0.0001); ② Subjective outcomes: debridement proficiency (RR = 1.44, P = 0.001), aseptic awareness (SMD = 1.58, P = 0.003), and other comprehensive competencies (self-learning, learning interest, learning efficiency, clinical thinking, team collaboration, etc., P < 0.001 for all). Satisfaction with the teaching method was also significantly higher (RR = 1.34, P < 0.0001). (3) Heterogeneity was observed in the study (I2 = 77-87%), which may be related to differences in teaching duration, case design, and assessment criteria. However, sensitivity analysis showed good stability of the results, indicating that the conclusions are informative.

Conclusion: Meta-analysis demonstrates that, in orthopedic education, the PBL-CBL teaching method offers significant advantages over LBL in enhancing students' theoretical knowledge, clinical skills, and comprehensive abilities. It also stimulates learning interest, improves teaching satisfaction, and facilitates the cultivation of orthopedic clinical talent. However, its generalizability requires further verification through research in different countries.

Keywords: Case-based learning; Lecture-based learning; Meta-analysis; Orthopedic education; Problem-based learning; Teaching efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The PRISMA flow chart of the literature selection for the meta-analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias diagram
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary of risk of bias
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot of the effect of the PBL-CBL group versus LBL group on theoretical scores
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Funnel plot of the effect of the PBL-CBL group versus LBL group on theoretical scores
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Sensitivity analysis of the effect of PBL-CBL versus LBL on theoretical scores
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Trim and Fill analysis results for PBL-CBL versus LBL on theoretical scores
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Forest plot of the effect of the PBL-CBL group versus LBL group on practical skills scores
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Funnel plot of the effect of the PBL-CBL group versus LBL group on practical skills scores
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Sensitivity analysis of the effect of PBL-CBL versus LBL on practical skills scores
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Trim and Fill analysis results for PBL-CBL versus LBL on practical skills scores
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Forest plot of the effect of the PBL-CBL group versus LBL group on (A. physical examination scores; B. case analysis scores; C. plaster immobilization skills; D. debridement technique proficiency; E. aseptic awareness; F. self-learning ability)
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
Forest plot of the effect of the PBL-CBL group versus LBL group on (A. learning interest; B. learning efficiency; C. clinical thinking ability; D. team collaboration ability; E. communication and expression abilities; F. CTDI-CV total score)
Fig. 14
Fig. 14
Forest plot of the effect of the PBL-CBL group versus LBL group on satisfaction with teaching methods

References

    1. Shi J, Cavagnaro MJ, Xu S, Zhao M. The application of three-dimensional technologies in the improvement of orthopedic surgery training and medical education quality: a comparative bibliometrics analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:852608. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu D, Li WG, Zhang DG, Mi BB. Application of PBL combined with CBL teaching method in orthopedic practice. China Continuing Med Educ. 2023;15 (06):77–81. 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2023.06.017.
    1. Lang B, Zhang L, Lin Y, Han L, Zhang C, Liu Y. Team-based learning pedagogy enhances the quality of Chinese pharmacy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19 (1):286. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bradbury NA. Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more. Adv Physiol Educ. 2016;40 (4):509–13. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeng HL, Chen DX, Li Q, Wang XY. Effects of seminar teaching method versus lecture-based learning in medical education: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Teach. 2020;42 (12):1343–9. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources