Comparison of Effects of the Interrupted and Vertical Mattress Sutures on Pain, Swelling, and Probing Depth Following Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 41054480
- PMCID: PMC12496397
- DOI: 10.1007/s12663-024-02405-z
Comparison of Effects of the Interrupted and Vertical Mattress Sutures on Pain, Swelling, and Probing Depth Following Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Introduction: Complications following dental extraction include the development of a dry socket, pain, swelling, infection, trismus, pocket formation in the adjacent teeth, or absence of healing. The material and technique used for suturing vastly influence the success or failure of a suture. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the postoperative pain, swelling, and distal probing depth of the mandibular second molar following the placement of interrupted suture (IS) and vertical mattress suture (VMS) after extraction of impacted third molars.
Material and methods: The present split-mouth randomized controlled trial was conducted on 100 patients requiring surgical extraction of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars. The extraction socket was closed by IS on one side and VMS on the other. The pain and swelling scores were obtained by the visual analog scale during the first-week post-extraction. The probing depth distal to the mandibular second molars was taken at 2-month intervals until 6 months post-extraction.
Results: Inter-group comparison revealed significantly lower values (P < 0.001) of pain levels and swelling scores for the IS group during the first four postoperative days. There was a mean increase in the pocket depth by 0.16 + 0.77 in the wounds closed by IF, while a reduction in the pocket depth with a 0.61 + 0.74 mean gain in attachment levels was noted in the VMS group. A statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in the pocket depth of the two groups was noted at every 2-month interval with greater pocket depth in patients of the IF group.
Conclusion: While IS can be considered a simple-to-execute suturing technique with less operative pain initially, the VMS was found to be better in the long run in its ability to reduce the detrimental effects on the periodontium of the adjacent tooth.
Keywords: Disimpaction; Impacted teeth; Pocket depth; Post-extraction pain; Suture techniques.
© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The authors are solely responsible for the content and writing of the paper. The authors have no affiliation with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
References
-
- Yuasa H, Kawai T, Sugiura M (2002) Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40(1):26–31 - PubMed
-
- Pierse JE, Dym H, Clarkson E (2012) Diagnosis and management of common postextraction complications. Dent Clin North Am 56(1):75–93 - PubMed
-
- Moturi K, Budumuru A, Satyasai RS (2022) Complications with impacted mandibular third molar surgery. In: Moturi K, Budumuru A (eds) Transalveolar extraction of the mandibular third molars. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 133–151
-
- Cho H, Lynham AJ, Hsu E (2017) Postoperative interventions to reduce inflammatory complications after third molar surgery: review of the current evidence. Aust Dent J 62(4):412–419 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous